UK’s trusted IT infrastructure partner since 2003
Servnet
FinanceToolsConfiguratorGet in Touch
Free tool · sized on 108 real target models

How few new servers replace the ones you have?

Describe the estate you run today, pick the machine you would buy, and this sizes the replacement — cores and memory worked out separately, because memory is what usually decides it, with the binding constraint named. Then it shows the rack space, the power and the carbon that consolidation actually releases.

1 · What you run today

One row per class of machine. The presets are indicative starting points by generation — replace them with your own figures wherever you have them.

2 · What you would replace it with

PowerEdge R770: 288 cores · 8.0 TB ceiling · 2U · 3.2 kW provisioned · data sheet

3
New hosts to replace 20, including one for failover
memory is the binding constraint
6.7:1
Consolidation ratio
640 cores and 7,680 GB today
34U
Rack height released
40U today, 6U after
3.72 kW
Power draw removed
9 kW today, 5.28 kW after
the binding constraint is memoryOn cores1 host200 cores needed ÷ 288 per hostOn memory2 hosts9,600 GB needed ÷ 8,176 usable per host
today ▬ after consolidation ▬Hosts203Rack height40U6UPower draw9 kW5.28 kW
45,622 kWh
Energy a year no longer used
110,376 → 64,754 kWh
£11,862
Electricity a year at the tariff you set
excludes cooling capital and licensing
6.57 t
CO₂e a year avoided
DESNZ 2026 UK factors

Turn this into a refresh plan

We will price the target build, check the licensing implications of fewer, denser hosts, and set out the migration sequence.

Consolidation, answered

What is a realistic server consolidation ratio?

It depends almost entirely on memory, not on cores. Replacing 2017-era two-socket servers with a current two-socket machine typically lands between 4:1 and 10:1, because a modern host carries four to eight times the memory and two to four times the cores. This calculator does not quote you a ratio — it derives one from the ceilings of the specific machine you pick, which is the only way the number means anything.

Why does memory usually decide the host count rather than cores?

Because vCPU can be overcommitted and memory should not be. A 4:1 vCPU-to-core ratio is routine in production, so core demand divides down by four; memory does not divide at all, since ballooning and swapping are exactly how consolidation projects turn into performance incidents. That asymmetry is why this tool sizes both independently and tells you which one is binding — most calculators only count cores and land on a host count that cannot hold the workload.

Should I include an N+1 host?

Almost always, and it is on by default. Without it, a single host failure leaves the survivors carrying the full load with no headroom, which is the same as having no failover at all. On a small cluster N+1 is a significant proportion of the cost, which is a real argument for fewer, larger hosts — and an argument against them, since each failure then takes more workload with it.

How much power does consolidation actually save?

More than people expect, because old servers idle badly. The calculator compares your current estate’s draw against the provisioned power of the target machine at the load factor you set, using power-supply configurations taken from each model’s own manufacturer document, then prices the difference at your tariff and converts it with the UK government’s 2026 emissions factors. It will also tell you when consolidation increases draw — which is what happens when you consolidate onto accelerator platforms, where the point is capability rather than efficiency.

Does fewer hosts mean a lower licence bill?

Often, but not automatically, and it is the detail that decides whether a refresh pays for itself. Per-core licensing (VMware, Windows Server Datacenter, SQL Server) responds to total cores, so consolidating onto fewer but much denser hosts can leave the core count — and the bill — unchanged or higher. Per-socket and per-host models behave differently again. Our licensing calculator works that side, and it is worth doing both before committing.

Where do the target machine figures come from?

From each model’s own manufacturer technical document — the maximum cores its processor table supports, the memory ceiling it states, its rack height and the power supplies it takes. The same verified library behind our 108 data sheets. Your current estate is your figures, with indicative presets by generation for anything you do not have to hand.

Where the numbers come from

Related

IT hardware refresh planner — the whole estate on a cycleServer finder — which models meet the requirementWhat the new estate draws and costsLicensing calculator — what fewer, denser hosts do to the billVMware alternatives and migration costsStudy: the rack runs out of power, not spaceAll Servnet tools

Talk to a UK specialist

Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.

or call 0800 987 4111