UK’s trusted IT infrastructure partner since 2003
Servnet
FinanceToolsConfiguratorGet in Touch
Offsite Tape Rotation vs In-Library Vaulting: Which Air Gap? — analysisOffsite Tape Rotation vs In-Library Vaulting: Which Air Gap? — analysis — reach
Technical · Backup · Architecture

Offsite Tape Rotation vs In-Library Vaulting: Which Air Gap?

Servnet Editorial · IT infrastructure analysis9 min read
Share

Every serious backup design keeps one copy that an attacker on the network cannot reach. For decades that meant exporting tapes from the library and sending them offsite. Modern libraries offer a second way: keep the tapes inside the box, but out of the network’s reach (and, with Ransom Block, the robot’s). Neither is simply better. They defend against different things, and the right design usually uses both.

Offsite rotation vs Active Vault vs Ransom Block
Offsite rotationActive VaultRansom BlockWhere the tape isAnother buildingVault partitionPart-ejected magazineRemote attackerProtectedSmall residual riskProtectedAdmin-level insiderSeparate custodyAdmin can undoNeeds site accessLoss of the buildingSurvivesLostLostMedia health checksRarely testedEDLM: i6, i6000, i7Not with EDLMRecoveryCourier + importRobot moves backRe-insert magazine
View the data behind this chart
Offsite rotation vs Active Vault vs Ransom Block
Offsite rotationActive VaultRansom Block
Where the tape isAnother buildingVault partitionPart-ejected magazine
Remote attackerProtectedSmall residual riskProtected
Admin-level insiderSeparate custodyAdmin can undoNeeds site access
Loss of the buildingSurvivesLostLost
Media health checksRarely testedEDLM: i6, i6000, i7Not with EDLM
RecoveryCourier + importRobot moves backRe-insert magazine

Why the offline copy is the one that matters

Ransomware crews now go after backups before they encrypt production, because a victim with clean, reachable backups does not pay. Disk repositories, snapshots and cloud buckets that the backup server can write to are all, in principle, reachable by someone who controls the backup server. A tape that is not in a drive is not.

Quantum’s Active Vault brief puts it plainly: the key to recovering from ransomware is keeping a copy of data that is completely inaccessible from any network, and a tape cartridge on a shelf is completely immune to ransomware. The question is how you get the tape to that state, and what else you give up on the way. For the wider immutability picture, see immutable vs air-gapped backup.

The traditional rotation, and what it costs

The classic pattern is a grandfather-father-son rotation: export the week’s or month’s tapes through the library’s import/export slots, box them, and hand them to a courier or carry them to a safe. It works, and it puts the copy in another building, which nothing else on this page does.

Its weaknesses are human. Quantum’s brief lists them: exporting and shelving tapes takes staff time, people misfile or lose cartridges, and tapes do not handle drops well. Retrieval means ordering tapes back from the store and importing them, which takes as long as your contract says. And shelved media is almost never tested, so a degraded cartridge is often discovered only when it is needed.

What in-library vaulting does instead

Quantum’s Scalar libraries offer three automated alternatives, which its Ransom Block brief describes in order of increasing security. Active Vault moves exported tapes into a library-managed partition that has no drives and no host connection and is visible only to library administrators. On the Scalar i6000 and i7 RAPTOR an export-redirect policy does this automatically, so the backup software performs a normal export and believes the tape has left; Quantum’s datasheet lists export redirect as not supported on the i3 and i6, where tapes are moved into the vault from the library GUI. Logical Tape Blocking refuses any request to move a tape in a blocked magazine, and can only be switched off at the library’s own panel. Ransom Block, on the Scalar i3 and i6, partly ejects a magazine so the robot physically cannot pick its tapes until someone pushes it back in.

The barcodes in a Ransom Block magazine can still be scanned, so presence can be audited remotely at any time. Quantum says this protects tapes from remote attack as securely as exporting them to a vault. See Scalar Active Vault and Ransom Block for how the levels stack.

Threat by threat

The two approaches separate cleanly when you take the threats one at a time.

  • •Remote attacker with network access: both defend. Active Vault alone leaves what Quantum calls a small risk if the library itself is compromised; Tape Blocking and Ransom Block need a person at the library to undo, which a remote attacker cannot supply.
  • •Insider with library admin rights: Active Vault is only as strong as the admin account, so multi-factor authentication and directory-controlled accounts matter. Ransom Block still needs physical access. Offsite tapes held under separate custody are the strongest answer here.
  • •Fire, flood or loss of the building: only the offsite copy survives. An in-library vault is in the same room as production.
  • •Media decay: tapes in an Active Vault partition can be scanned on a schedule with Quantum’s EDLM on the Scalar i6, i6000 and i7 RAPTOR, using drives with their external ports disabled. EDLM does not scan tapes under Tape Blocking or Ransom Block, so decide per magazine which you want. Shelved tapes are rarely tested at all.
  • •Speed of recovery: vaulted tapes are moved back by the robot, with no courier in the loop.
Which offline copy for which threat?
Which risk are you covering?
Cyber attackRogue adminSite lossMedia decay
In-library vault
Ransom Block / offsite
Offsite or 2nd site
Vault + EDLM scans

A pattern that uses both

For most organisations we design two offline copies with different jobs. The frequent copy, the one you would restore from after a cyber attack, goes into an in-library vault (by export-redirect policy on an i6000 or i7 RAPTOR, from the library GUI on an i3 or i6), with Tape Blocking or Ransom Block on the magazines you do not need EDLM to scan. A less frequent copy, often the monthly or yearly full, still leaves the building, either on tape to an offsite store or as a replicated backup at a second site.

That keeps the attack-recovery copy fast and automated, and keeps a site-loss copy that does not depend on the building surviving. It also shrinks the courier job to the copies that genuinely need to travel.

Setting up the in-library side

The work is in policy, not hardware. Create a vault partition for each application partition that writes offline copies. On an i6000 or i7 RAPTOR, set an export-redirect policy so exported tapes go to the vault instead of the import/export slots; on an i3 or i6, which do not support export redirect, build the move into the vault into the job runbook. Protect the library administrator accounts with MFA, LDAP or Active Directory, and IP restrictions before anything else. Decide which magazines get Tape Blocking or, on an i3 or i6, Ransom Block, and whether Automated Media Return should bring tapes back when their hold ends.

Two licensing details change the sums. Active Vault is itself an optional feature, and its partitions are built from unlicensed slots, so the vault does not use the slots you license for backup. EDLM is a separate optional licence that needs dedicated scanning drives. Both are covered in our tape library sizing guide.

Share
Key takeaways
  • ✓Offsite rotation is the only air gap that survives loss of the building; in-library vaulting is faster, automated and testable.
  • ✓Scalar libraries offer three in-library levels: Active Vault, Logical Tape Blocking and Ransom Block (i3 and i6 only).
  • ✓Active Vault alone depends on library admin security; the physical levels need someone at the library to undo.
  • ✓Use both: vault the attack-recovery copy in the library and send a less frequent copy offsite or to a second site.
  • ✓Active Vault is optional and its partitions use unlicensed slots; EDLM scanning is a separate licence with its own drives.
Frequently asked

FAQs — Offsite Tape Rotation vs In-Library Vaulting

Choosing an air gap

Is a tape in an in-library vault really air-gapped?

It is offline to the network: Quantum’s Active Vault partitions have no drives and no host connection, and only library administrators can see them. With Ransom Block the robot cannot even reach the tapes until someone re-inserts the magazine. It is not offsite, so it does not protect against loss of the building.

Do we still need offsite tapes if we use Active Vault?

For protection against fire, flood or theft, yes, or an equivalent copy at another site. In-library vaulting is the faster and more automated defence against cyber attack; an offsite copy covers the physical disasters it cannot. Most designs keep both, with the offsite copy made less often.

Running it

Does Active Vault need changes to our backup software?

No. Quantum states that Active Vault works with any application. On the Scalar i6000 and i7 RAPTOR the software performs a normal tape export and the library’s export-redirect policy moves the tape into the vault partition instead of the import/export slots. On the i3 and i6, which do not support export redirect, an administrator moves tapes into the vault from the library GUI. Tapes can be returned by an administrator or by the Automated Media Return policy.

How do we know vaulted tapes will still read?

On Scalar i6, i6000 and i7 RAPTOR libraries, the optional EDLM licence scans tapes in the vault on a schedule using drives whose external data ports are disabled. A full scan of a full LTO-9 cartridge takes about 20 hours, so large vaults are checked by policy rather than end to end every month.

Related

Got a question this article didn't answer?

One conversation with an engineer who's done this before. No sales script.

Talk to Servnet →

Talk to a UK specialist

Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.

or call 0800 987 4111