Dell R260 vs Lenovo SR250 V3
A specification-by-specification comparison of the Dell PowerEdge R260 and the Lenovo ThinkSystem SR250 V3, built from Dell’s and Lenovo’s own documents. 1 headline measure favours the R260, 4 favour the SR250 V3, and 18 processors appear in both lists.
Bottom line. R260 leads on virtualisation. SR250 V3 leads on storage density, AI and acceleration, network throughput. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.

The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the R260 if…
- Cores, fully populated: 12 against 8 on the SR250 V3
- Short depth: Dell’s comparison table quotes 461.14 mm without the bezel, or 426.6 mm with the cabled supply, against 585 mm for the previous-generation R250.
Choose the SR250 V3 if…
- Drive bays: 8 against 6 on the R260
- Accelerators: Up to 1 against None listed on the R260
- Largest power supply: 800 W against 700 W on the R260
- At 561 mm deep and 43 mm high it suits shallow comms-room cabinets, and Lenovo offers a two-post screw-in rail kit alongside its four-post rails.
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | R260 | SR250 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 19 | 18 |
| Most cores per processor | 12 | 8 |
| Processor families | Xeon 6300 · Xeon E-2400 · Pentium | Pentium · Xeon E-2400 · Xeon 6300 |
Memory
| Specification | R260 | SR250 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory types | UDIMM DDR5-5600 (ECC) | ECC UDIMM DDR5-5600 · ECC UDIMM DDR5-4800 |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | R260 | SR250 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum bays | 6 | 8 |
| Documented layouts | 5 | 6 |
| Bay sizes | 2.5-inch · 3.5-inch | 3.5-inch · 2.5-inch |
| Boot devices | BOSS-N1 (M.2) · Internal USB 3.2 Gen1 | M.2 SATA/x4 NVMe 2-Bay Adapter (4Y37A79663) · M.2 RAID B540i-2i SATA/NVMe Adapter (4Y37A90063) |
| Storage controllers | 5 | 4 |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | R260 | SR250 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Accelerators supported | None listed | Up to 1 |
| Network cards listed | 7 | 8 |
Power & platform
| Specification | R260 | SR250 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Output range | 450–700 W | 800–800 W |
| Management | iDRAC9 | XClarity Controller 2 |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | 461.14 mm without bezel / 496.8 mm with bezel / 426.6 mm with cabled PSU and without bezel | — |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
R260: processors by cores and TDP
SR250 V3: processors by cores and TDP
R260: memory with every slot filled
SR250 V3: memory with every slot filled
R260: drive bays
Front panel
6 × 2.5" SAS/SATA at the front — 6 bays in total.
SR250 V3: drive bays
Front panel
8 × 2.5" SAS/SATA at the front — 8 bays in total.
R260: power supplies
SR250 V3: power supplies
18 processors you can order in either
Both vendor documents list these parts, so a build can be matched across the two and the comparison comes down to the chassis: 1 more are exclusive to the R260 and 0 to the SR250 V3.
| Processor | Cores | TDP |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Xeon 6369P | 8 | 95 W |
| Intel Xeon 6357P | 8 | 80 W |
| Intel Xeon 6353P | 8 | 65 W |
| Intel Xeon E-2488 | 8 | 95 W |
| Intel Xeon E-2478 | 8 | 80 W |
| Intel Xeon E-2468 | 8 | 65 W |
| Intel Xeon 6349P | 6 | 95 W |
| Intel Xeon 6337P | 6 | 80 W |
| Intel Xeon 6333P | 6 | 65 W |
| Intel Xeon E-2486 | 6 | 95 W |
| Intel Xeon E-2456 | 6 | 80 W |
| Intel Xeon E-2436 | 6 | 65 W |
R260 vs SR250 V3, answered
Is the R260 or the SR250 V3 the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The R260 lists 19 processors up to 12 cores at 95 W; the SR250 V3 lists 18 up to 8 cores at 95 W. Fully populated that is 12 cores against 8.
Which holds more memory?
The R260 has 4 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 128 GB. The SR250 V3 has 4 and 128 GB.
Which takes more drives?
R260: 6 bays across 5 documented layouts. SR250 V3: 8 across 6. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
R260: no accelerator option in its document. SR250 V3: up to 1, 0 double-wide listed.
Do they share any processors?
Yes — 18 processors appear in both documents, including the Intel Xeon 6369P. That makes a like-for-like build possible on either server.
Where these figures come from. R260: Dell PowerEdge R260 Technical Guide (June 2026, Rev. A04) (Dell document). SR250 V3: Lenovo ThinkSystem SR250 V3 Server Product Guide (publication date is not printed in the text export) (Lenovo document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Other comparisons in this class
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.
