Dell R6625 vs Dell R6725
A specification-by-specification comparison of the Dell PowerEdge R6625 and the Dell PowerEdge R6725, built from Dell’s own documents. None of the headline measures favour the R6625; 4 favour the R6725, and they share no processors.
Bottom line. R6725 leads on virtualisation, storage density, AI and acceleration, network throughput. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.
The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the R6625 if…
- Two sockets in one rack unit: a pair of 128-core 9754s gives 256 cores, and Dell rates them for air at 30°C with the 8 × 2.5-inch NVMe front or no backplane.
Choose the R6725 if…
- Cores, fully populated: 384 against 256 on the R6625
- Drive bays: 22 against 16 on the R6625
- Accelerators: Up to 3 against Up to 2 on the R6625
- Two EPYC 9005 sockets in 1U, each up to 192 cores with the EPYC 9965 — 384 cores in a single rack unit.
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | R6625 | R6725 |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 19 | 20 |
| Most cores per processor | 128 | 192 |
| Highest processor TDP | 360 W | 500 W |
| Processor families | AMD EPYC 9004 | AMD EPYC 9005 |
| Single-processor option | Yes | No |
Memory
| Specification | R6625 | R6725 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory types | RDIMM DDR5-4800 · RDIMM DDR5-5600 · RDIMM DDR5-6400 · 3DS RDIMM DDR5 | RDIMM DDR5-6400 |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | R6625 | R6725 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum bays | 16 | 22 |
| Documented layouts | 14 | 8 |
| Boot devices | BOSS-N1 · IDSDM | BOSS-N1 DC-MHS (RAID 0/1, 2 x M.2 NVMe 480 GB or 960 GB read-intensive) |
| Storage controllers | 10 | 5 |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | R6625 | R6725 |
|---|---|---|
| Accelerators supported | Up to 2 | Up to 3 |
| OCP slots | 1 | 2 |
| Network cards listed | 17 | 15 |
Power & platform
| Specification | R6625 | R6725 |
|---|---|---|
| Power-supply options | 7 | 8 |
| Input types | AC · −48 V DC · 277 VAC / HVDC | AC · 277 VAC / HVDC |
| Management | iDRAC9 | iDRAC10 |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | 822.89 mm with bezel / 809.05 mm without bezel | 815.14 mm without bezel / 816.92 mm with bezel |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
R6625: processors by cores and TDP
R6725: processors by cores and TDP
R6625: memory with every slot filled
R6725: memory with every slot filled
R6625: drive bays
Front panel
16 × EDSFF NVMe at the front — 16 bays in total.
R6725: drive bays
Front panel
20 × EDSFF NVMe at the front — 20 bays in total.
R6625: power supplies
R6725: power supplies
R6625 vs R6725, answered
Is the R6625 or the R6725 the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The R6625 lists 19 processors up to 128 cores at 360 W; the R6725 lists 20 up to 192 cores at 500 W. Fully populated that is 256 cores against 384.
Which holds more memory?
The R6625 has 24 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 6 TB. The R6725 has 24 and 6 TB.
Which takes more drives?
R6625: 16 bays across 14 documented layouts. R6725: 22 across 8. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
R6625: up to 2 accelerators, 0 double-wide cards listed. R6725: up to 3, 0 double-wide listed.
Do they share any processors?
No. The two documents list different processors, so a like-for-like processor build is not possible across these two.
Where these figures come from. R6625: Dell PowerEdge R6625 Technical Guide (July 2026, Rev. A07) (Dell document). R6725: Dell PowerEdge R6725 Technical Guide (May 2026) (Dell document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Other comparisons in this class
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.

