Dell R6625 vs Lenovo SR645 V3
A specification-by-specification comparison of the Dell PowerEdge R6625 and the Lenovo ThinkSystem SR645 V3, built from Dell’s and Lenovo’s own documents. None of the headline measures favour the R6625; 3 favour the SR645 V3, and 19 processors appear in both lists.
Bottom line. SR645 V3 leads on virtualisation, AI and acceleration, network throughput. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.

The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the R6625 if…
- Two sockets in one rack unit: a pair of 128-core 9754s gives 256 cores, and Dell rates them for air at 30°C with the 8 × 2.5-inch NVMe front or no backplane.
Choose the SR645 V3 if…
- Cores, fully populated: 320 against 256 on the R6625
- Accelerators: Up to 5 against Up to 2 on the R6625
- Fastest network option: 200 GbE class against 100 GbE class on the R6625
- Two EPYC sockets in one rack unit: a pair of 160-core 9845s gives 320 cores, and each processor drives its own 12 DDR5 channels.
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | R6625 | SR645 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 19 | 46 |
| Most cores per processor | 128 | 160 |
| Highest processor TDP | 360 W | 400 W |
| Processor families | AMD EPYC 9004 | AMD EPYC 9005 · AMD EPYC 9004 |
Memory
| Specification | R6625 | SR645 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory types | RDIMM DDR5-4800 · RDIMM DDR5-5600 · RDIMM DDR5-6400 · 3DS RDIMM DDR5 | RDIMM DDR5-6400 (5th Gen EPYC) · RDIMM DDR5-4800 (4th Gen EPYC) · 9x4 RDIMM · 3DS RDIMM DDR5-6400 |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | R6625 | SR645 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Documented layouts | 14 | 19 |
| Bay sizes | 3.5-inch · 2.5-inch · E3.S | 3.5-inch · E3.S · 2.5-inch |
| Boot devices | BOSS-N1 · IDSDM | M.2 SATA/NVMe 2-Bay Enablement Kit (4Y37A09738) · M.2 SATA/x4 NVMe 2-Bay Adapter (4Y37A79663) · M.2 NVMe 2-Bay RAID Adapter (4Y37A09750) + 1 more |
| Storage controllers | 10 | 18 |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | R6625 | SR645 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Accelerators supported | Up to 2 | Up to 5 |
| PCIe network slots | 3 | 5 |
| Network cards listed | 17 | 30 |
Power & platform
| Specification | R6625 | SR645 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power-supply options | 7 | 8 |
| Output range | 800–1,800 W | 750–1,800 W |
| Input types | AC · −48 V DC · 277 VAC / HVDC | AC · −48 V DC |
| Management | iDRAC9 | XClarity Controller 2 |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | 822.89 mm with bezel / 809.05 mm without bezel | — |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
R6625: processors by cores and TDP
SR645 V3: processors by cores and TDP
R6625: memory with every slot filled
SR645 V3: memory with every slot filled
R6625: drive bays
Front panel
16 × EDSFF NVMe at the front — 16 bays in total.
SR645 V3: drive bays
Front panel
16 × EDSFF NVMe at the front — 16 bays in total.
R6625: power supplies
SR645 V3: power supplies
19 processors you can order in either
Both vendor documents list these parts, so a build can be matched across the two and the comparison comes down to the chassis: 0 more are exclusive to the R6625 and 27 to the SR645 V3.
| Processor | Cores | TDP |
|---|---|---|
| AMD EPYC 9754 | 128 | 360 W |
| AMD EPYC 9734 | 112 | 340 W |
| AMD EPYC 9684X | 96 | 320 W |
| AMD EPYC 9654 | 96 | 360 W |
| AMD EPYC 9634 | 84 | 290 W |
| AMD EPYC 9554 | 64 | 360 W |
| AMD EPYC 9534 | 64 | 280 W |
| AMD EPYC 9454 | 48 | 290 W |
| AMD EPYC 9474F | 48 | 360 W |
| AMD EPYC 9384X | 32 | 320 W |
| AMD EPYC 9354 | 32 | 280 W |
| AMD EPYC 9334 | 32 | 210 W |
R6625 vs SR645 V3, answered
Is the R6625 or the SR645 V3 the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The R6625 lists 19 processors up to 128 cores at 360 W; the SR645 V3 lists 46 up to 160 cores at 400 W. Fully populated that is 256 cores against 320.
Which holds more memory?
The R6625 has 24 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 6 TB. The SR645 V3 has 24 and 6 TB.
Which takes more drives?
R6625: 16 bays across 14 documented layouts. SR645 V3: 16 across 19. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
R6625: up to 2 accelerators, 0 double-wide cards listed. SR645 V3: up to 5, 0 double-wide listed.
Do they share any processors?
Yes — 19 processors appear in both documents, including the AMD EPYC 9754. That makes a like-for-like build possible on either server.
Where these figures come from. R6625: Dell PowerEdge R6625 Technical Guide (July 2026, Rev. A07) (Dell document). SR645 V3: Lenovo ThinkSystem SR645 V3 Server Product Guide (publication date is not printed in the text export; guide contains 'New as of July 2026' notes) (Lenovo document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Other comparisons in this class
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.
