UK’s trusted IT infrastructure partner since 2003
Servnet
ConfiguratorGet in Touch
Nested RAID explained: RAID 10, 50 and 60 — analysisNested RAID explained: RAID 10, 50 and 60 — analysis — reach
Storage · RAID

Nested RAID explained: RAID 10, 50 and 60

Servnet Storage Team · Storage & Data Protection6 min read

Nested RAID stripes data across several smaller arrays to combine their strengths — RAID 10, 50 and 60 are the common ones. Size each in the RAID calculator.

Nested RAID — 10 vs 50 vs 60
RAID 10RAID 50RAID 60Built fromMirrorsRAID 5 groupsRAID 6 groupsEfficiency50%per groupper groupSurvives1 / pair1 / group2 / groupBest forDB / VM writesBalanced scaleResilient capacity

What 'nested' means

Nested (or hybrid) RAID builds a RAID 0 stripe on top of several lower-level arrays. The two digits tell you the layers: RAID 10 stripes across mirrors (1+0), RAID 50 stripes across RAID 5 groups (5+0), and RAID 60 stripes across RAID 6 groups (6+0). The top-level stripe adds performance; the lower-level arrays provide the redundancy.

The big practical benefit is splitting a large pool into smaller groups that rebuild independently and faster, while limiting the blast radius of a failure to one group.

RAID 10 vs 50 vs 60

RAID 10 (striped mirrors) gives the best write performance and fastest rebuilds at 50% efficiency — ideal for databases. RAID 50 (striped RAID 5) balances capacity and performance, surviving one failure per group. RAID 60 (striped RAID 6) is the most resilient, surviving two failures per group — the choice for very large capacity arrays.

Fault tolerance is per group: RAID 50 survives one drive per group, RAID 60 two — but a group that loses one too many is fatal even if other groups are healthy. The calculator spells out the guaranteed and best-case figures.

Which nested level?
Priority at scale?
write speed
RAID 10
balance
RAID 50
resilience
RAID 60

When to nest

Nest when a single flat array would be too big to rebuild safely or too slow. A 24-drive flat RAID 6 rebuilds slowly and risks a long exposure window; as two or four RAID 6 groups (RAID 60) it rebuilds per-group and faster. For write-heavy workloads, RAID 10 is the nested level of choice.

Use the calculator's compare mode to weigh, say, RAID 60 vs RAID 10 on the same drives — capacity vs write performance.

Key takeaways
  • Nested RAID stripes (RAID 0) across lower arrays: 10 = mirrors, 50 = RAID 5 groups, 60 = RAID 6 groups.
  • Smaller groups rebuild independently and faster, limiting a failure's blast radius.
  • Fault tolerance is per group — a group losing one too many drives is still fatal.
  • RAID 10 for write performance; RAID 60 for resilient large-capacity pools.
Frequently asked

FAQs — Nested RAID explained

Nested RAID

What is the difference between RAID 10 and RAID 0+1?

Both combine striping and mirroring. RAID 10 stripes across mirrored pairs (mirror first, then stripe); RAID 0+1 mirrors two stripes (stripe first, then mirror). RAID 10 generally tolerates failures better and rebuilds faster, so it's the usual choice.

How many drives can RAID 50 lose?

One per RAID 5 group. A two-group RAID 50 can survive two failures if they're in different groups, but a second failure in the same group before its rebuild finishes loses the array.

Is RAID 60 worth it over RAID 6?

On very large arrays, yes — splitting into RAID 6 groups rebuilds faster and keeps dual-parity protection per group. On smaller arrays, a single RAID 6 is simpler.

Related

Continue reading

More in Storage

Got a question this article didn't answer?

One conversation with an engineer who's done this before. No sales script.

Talk to Servnet →