Dell MX760c vs HPE 480 Gen12 Compute Module
A specification-by-specification comparison of the Dell PowerEdge MX760c and the HPE Synergy 480 Gen12 Compute Module, built from Dell’s and HPE’s own documents. 2 headline measures favour the MX760c, 1 favours the 480 Gen12 Compute Module, and they share no processors.
Bottom line. MX760c leads on network throughput. 480 Gen12 Compute Module leads on virtualisation. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.


The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the MX760c if…
- Largest power supply: 3,000 W against — on the 480 Gen12 Compute Module
- Fastest network option: 100 GbE class against 50 GbE class on the 480 Gen12 Compute Module
- Two sockets and 32 DDR5 slots — eight channels per processor, two DIMMs per channel — in a sled 51 mm high, with up to 8 TB of RDIMM.
Choose the 480 Gen12 Compute Module if…
- Cores, fully populated: 172 against 96 on the MX760c
- Two Xeon 6 P-core sockets, up to 86 cores each, and 16 DDR5 slots per processor rated to 6400 MT/s — in a module 6.35 cm high.
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | MX760c | 480 Gen12 Compute Module |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 28 | 16 |
| Most cores per processor | 48 | 86 |
| Highest processor TDP | 330 W | 350 W |
| Processor families | 4th Gen Xeon Scalable · 5th Gen Xeon Scalable | Xeon 6 P-core |
Memory
| Specification | MX760c | 480 Gen12 Compute Module |
|---|---|---|
| Fastest rated speed | 5,600 MT/s | 6,400 MT/s |
| Memory types | RDIMM DDR5-4800 (4th Gen Xeon; 4400 MT/s at 2DPC) · RDIMM DDR5-5600 (5th Gen Xeon; 4400 MT/s at 2DPC) | RDIMM DDR5-6400 · 3DS RDIMM DDR5-6400 |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | MX760c | 480 Gen12 Compute Module |
|---|---|---|
| Boot devices | BOSS-N1 (HWRAID 1, 2 x M.2 SSDs; PCIe Gen4 x4 from CPU1; 480 GB or 960 GB per spec sheet) · USB (internal USB 3.0 port; 'USB or BOSS' per spec sheet) | HPE Synergy NS204i-d v2 M.2 Boot Storage Device · HPE 480GB NVMe Gen4 Mainstream Performance Read Intensive M.2 2280 PE9010 SSD · HPE 960GB NVMe Gen4 Mainstream Performance Read Intensive M.2 2280 PE9010 SSD |
| Storage controllers | 5 | 3 |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | MX760c | 480 Gen12 Compute Module |
|---|---|---|
| Network cards listed | 7 | 3 |
Power & platform
| Specification | MX760c | 480 Gen12 Compute Module |
|---|---|---|
| Power-supply options | 1 | 0 |
| Output range | 3,000–3,000 W | — |
| Input types | AC | — |
| Management | iDRAC9 | HPE iLO 7 |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | sled 622.35 mm (4/6 x 2.5-inch) or 631.77 mm (8 x E3.S) handle closed | 6.35 x 21.4 x 60.0 cm (2.5 x 8.43 x 23.62 in) H x W x D |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
MX760c: processors by cores and TDP
480 Gen12 Compute Module: processors by cores and TDP
MX760c: memory with every slot filled
480 Gen12 Compute Module: memory with every slot filled
MX760c: drive bays
Front panel
8 × EDSFF NVMe at the front — 8 bays in total.
480 Gen12 Compute Module: drive bays
Front panel
8 × EDSFF NVMe at the front — 8 bays in total.
MX760c: power supplies
480 Gen12 Compute Module: power supplies
Powered by the chassis or rack it installs into.
MX760c vs 480 Gen12 Compute Module, answered
Is the MX760c or the 480 Gen12 Compute Module the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The MX760c lists 28 processors up to 48 cores at 330 W; the 480 Gen12 Compute Module lists 16 up to 86 cores at 350 W. Fully populated that is 96 cores against 172.
Which holds more memory?
The MX760c has 32 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 8 TB. The 480 Gen12 Compute Module has 32 and 8.0 TB.
Which takes more drives?
MX760c: 8 bays across 4 documented layouts. 480 Gen12 Compute Module: 8 across 4. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
Neither vendor document lists an accelerator option for these models.
Do they share any processors?
No. The two documents list different processors, so a like-for-like processor build is not possible across these two.
Where these figures come from. MX760c: Dell PowerEdge MX760c Technical Guide (Rev. A05, June 2026) (Dell document). 480 Gen12 Compute Module: HPE Synergy 480 Gen12 Compute Module QuickSpecs (Version 13 - 08-Sep-2026) (HPE document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.