Dell R470 vs HPE DL320 Gen11
A specification-by-specification comparison of the Dell PowerEdge R470 and the HPE ProLiant DL320 Gen11, built from Dell’s and HPE’s own documents. 4 headline measures favour the R470, 1 favours the DL320 Gen11, and 1 processors appear in both lists.
Bottom line. R470 leads on virtualisation, databases and in-memory work, storage density, network throughput. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.
The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the R470 if…
- Cores, fully populated: 144 against 64 on the DL320 Gen11
- Memory ceiling: 4 TB against 2.04 TB on the DL320 Gen11
- Drive bays: 16 against 12 on the DL320 Gen11
- Up to 144 E-cores or 86 P-cores from one socket in 1U, and every processor on Dell’s list is rated for 35°C ambient in each storage layout of its thermal tables.
Choose the DL320 Gen11 if…
- Largest power supply: 2,200 W against 1,500 W on the R470
- Four chassis on one platform — 4 LFF, 8+2 SFF, 12 LFF and GPU Dense — so the same model covers a branch file server, a 1U disk shelf or an accelerator node.
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | R470 | DL320 Gen11 |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 23 | 46 |
| Most cores per processor | 144 | 64 |
| Highest processor TDP | 350 W | 330 W |
| Processor families | Xeon 6 E-core · Xeon 6 P-core | 5th Gen Xeon Scalable · 4th Gen Xeon Scalable · Xeon 6 P-core |
Memory
| Specification | R470 | DL320 Gen11 |
|---|---|---|
| Largest module listed | 256 GB | 96 GB |
| Fastest rated speed | 6,400 MT/s | 5,600 MT/s |
| Memory types | RDIMM DDR5-6400 | RDIMM DDR5-5600 · RDIMM DDR5-4800 |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | R470 | DL320 Gen11 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum bays | 16 | 12 |
| Documented layouts | 6 | 7 |
| Bay sizes | 2.5-inch · 3.5-inch · E3.S | 3.5-inch · 2.5-inch · E3.S |
| Boot devices | BOSS-N1 DC-MHS (HW RAID 1, 2 x M.2 NVMe SSDs 480 GB / 960 GB) · M.2 interposer with up to 2 x M.2 NVMe SSDs · Internal USB | HPE NS204i-u Gen11 NVMe Hot Plug Boot Optimized Storage Device · HPE ProLiant DL320 Gen11 NS204i-u NVMe OS Boot Device Cable Kit · HPE ProLiant DL320 Gen11 NS204i-u Security Lock Removal FIO Trigger System Setting + 1 more |
| Storage controllers | 6 | 13 |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | R470 | DL320 Gen11 |
|---|---|---|
| Double-wide cards listed | 0 | 3 |
| OCP slots | 2 | 1 |
| PCIe network slots | 4 | 2 |
| Network cards listed | 16 | 30 |
Power & platform
| Specification | R470 | DL320 Gen11 |
|---|---|---|
| Power-supply options | 7 | 6 |
| Output range | 800–1,500 W | 500–2,200 W |
| Input types | AC · 277 VAC / HVDC | AC · −48 V DC |
| Management | iDRAC10 | HPE iLO 6 |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | 815.14 mm without bezel (rear I/O) / 829.44 mm without bezel (front I/O) | 8 SFF 60.51 cm (23.82 in) |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
R470: processors by cores and TDP
DL320 Gen11: processors by cores and TDP
R470: memory with every slot filled
DL320 Gen11: memory with every slot filled
R470: drive bays
Front panel
16 × EDSFF NVMe at the front — 16 bays in total.
DL320 Gen11: drive bays
Front panel
12 × 3.5" SAS/SATA at the front — 12 bays in total.
R470: power supplies
DL320 Gen11: power supplies
1 processors you can order in either
Both vendor documents list these parts, so a build can be matched across the two and the comparison comes down to the chassis: 22 more are exclusive to the R470 and 45 to the DL320 Gen11.
| Processor | Cores | TDP |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Xeon 6 6724P | 16 | 210 W |
R470 vs DL320 Gen11, answered
Is the R470 or the DL320 Gen11 the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The R470 lists 23 processors up to 144 cores at 350 W; the DL320 Gen11 lists 46 up to 64 cores at 330 W. Fully populated that is 144 cores against 64.
Which holds more memory?
The R470 has 16 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 4 TB. The DL320 Gen11 has 16 and 2.04 TB.
Which takes more drives?
R470: 16 bays across 6 documented layouts. DL320 Gen11: 12 across 7. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
R470: up to 4 accelerators, 0 double-wide cards listed. DL320 Gen11: up to 4, 3 double-wide listed.
Do they share any processors?
Yes — 1 processor appears in both documents, including the Intel Xeon 6 6724P. That makes a like-for-like build possible on either server.
Where these figures come from. R470: Dell PowerEdge R470 Technical Guide (December 2025) (Dell document). DL320 Gen11: HPE ProLiant DL320 Gen11 QuickSpecs (Version 41 - 03-Aug-2026) (HPE document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Other comparisons in this class
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.

