Dell R660 vs Dell R660xs
A specification-by-specification comparison of the Dell PowerEdge R660 and the Dell PowerEdge R660xs, built from Dell’s own documents. 4 headline measures favour the R660 and none favour the R660xs, and 18 processors appear in both lists.
Bottom line. R660 leads on virtualisation, databases and in-memory work, storage density, AI and acceleration. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.
The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the R660 if…
- Cores, fully populated: 128 against 64 on the R660xs
- Memory ceiling: 8 TB against 1.5 TB on the R660xs
- Drive bays: 16 against 12 on the R660xs
- The same 51 processors and 32 DDR5 slots as the 2U R760 in a 1U chassis, with up to 64 cores per socket and 8 TB of memory.
Choose the R660xs if…
- A short 1U: 712.95 mm from rack ears to PSU handles for the 10-bay, 4 × 3.5-inch and 8 × NVMe builds, 661.37 mm for the 8 × SAS/SATA or diskless chassis, and 748.79 mm with the bezel against 822.88 mm for the R660.
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | R660 | R660xs |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 51 | 21 |
| Most cores per processor | 64 | 32 |
| Highest processor TDP | 350 W | 225 W |
| Processor families | Xeon Max (HBM) · 4th Gen Xeon Scalable · 5th Gen Xeon Scalable | 5th Gen Xeon Scalable · 4th Gen Xeon Scalable |
Memory
| Specification | R660 | R660xs |
|---|---|---|
| DIMM slots | 32 | 16 |
| Slots per processor | 16 | 8 |
| Largest module listed | 256 GB | 96 GB |
| Fastest rated speed | 6,400 MT/s | 5,600 MT/s |
| Memory types | RDIMM DDR5-4800 · RDIMM DDR5-5600 · RDIMM DDR5-6400 | RDIMM DDR5-4800 · RDIMM DDR5-5600 |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | R660 | R660xs |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum bays | 16 | 12 |
| Documented layouts | 13 | 10 |
| Bay sizes | 2.5-inch · E3.S | 3.5-inch · 2.5-inch |
| Boot devices | BOSS-N1 | BOSS-N1 (2 x M.2 NVMe 480/960 GB, HW RAID 0/1, Marvell 88NR2241, cold-swap internal) · Internal USB |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | R660 | R660xs |
|---|---|---|
| Accelerators supported | Up to 3 | None listed |
| Network cards listed | 26 | 27 |
Power & platform
| Specification | R660 | R660xs |
|---|---|---|
| Power-supply options | 8 | 9 |
| Output range | 700–1,800 W | 600–1,800 W |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | 822.88 mm with bezel / 809.04 mm without bezel | 677.1 mm ear-to-rear-wall (10 x 2.5 / 4 x 3.5 / 8 x NVMe chassis) or 626.42 mm (8 x SAS/SATA or no-backplane chassis) |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
R660: processors by cores and TDP
R660xs: processors by cores and TDP
R660: memory with every slot filled
R660xs: memory with every slot filled
R660: drive bays
Front panel
16 × EDSFF NVMe at the front — 16 bays in total.
R660xs: drive bays
Front panel
Rear module
10 × 2.5" NVMe at the front, plus 2 × 2.5" SAS/SATA + NVMe at the rear — 12 bays in total.
R660: power supplies
R660xs: power supplies
18 processors you can order in either
Both vendor documents list these parts, so a build can be matched across the two and the comparison comes down to the chassis: 33 more are exclusive to the R660 and 3 to the R660xs.
| Processor | Cores | TDP |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Xeon Gold 6414U | 32 | 250 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6448Y | 32 | 225 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6438Y+ | 32 | 205 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 5420+ | 28 | 205 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 5512U | 28 | 185 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6442Y | 24 | 225 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 5418Y | 24 | 185 W |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ | 20 | 165 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6426Y | 16 | 185 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 5416S | 16 | 150 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y | 16 | 195 W |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4514Y | 16 | 150 W |
R660 vs R660xs, answered
Is the R660 or the R660xs the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The R660 lists 51 processors up to 64 cores at 350 W; the R660xs lists 21 up to 32 cores at 225 W. Fully populated that is 128 cores against 64.
Which holds more memory?
The R660 has 32 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 8 TB. The R660xs has 16 and 1.5 TB.
Which takes more drives?
R660: 16 bays across 13 documented layouts. R660xs: 12 across 10. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
R660: up to 3 accelerators, 0 double-wide cards listed. R660xs: no accelerator option in its document.
Do they share any processors?
Yes — 18 processors appear in both documents, including the Intel Xeon Gold 6414U. That makes a like-for-like build possible on either server.
Where these figures come from. R660: Dell PowerEdge R660 Technical Guide (June 2026, Rev. A01) (Dell document). R660xs: Dell PowerEdge R660xs Technical Guide (June 2026, Rev. A05) (Dell document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Other comparisons in this class
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.

