Dell R6615 vs HPE DL320 Gen12
A specification-by-specification comparison of the Dell PowerEdge R6615 and the HPE ProLiant Compute DL320 Gen12, built from Dell’s and HPE’s own documents. None of the headline measures favour the R6615; 6 favour the DL320 Gen12, and they share no processors.
Bottom line. DL320 Gen12 leads on virtualisation, databases and in-memory work, storage density, AI and acceleration, network throughput. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.
The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the R6615 if…
- One socket spans the whole EPYC 9004 range Dell lists here, from 16-core parts to the 128-core 9754, in a single rack unit.
Choose the DL320 Gen12 if…
- Cores, fully populated: 144 against 128 on the R6615
- Memory ceiling: 4 TB against 3 TB on the R6615
- Drive bays: 20 against 16 on the R6615
- Xeon 6 in a single socket: E-core parts up to 144 cores or P-core parts up to 86, including six Rich I/O processors HPE groups as single-socket parts.
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | R6615 | DL320 Gen12 |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 23 | 32 |
| Most cores per processor | 128 | 144 |
| Highest processor TDP | 400 W | 350 W |
| Processor families | AMD EPYC 9004 | Xeon 6 E-core · Xeon 6 P-core |
Memory
| Specification | R6615 | DL320 Gen12 |
|---|---|---|
| DIMM slots | 12 | 16 |
| Slots per processor | 12 | 16 |
| Fastest rated speed | — | 6,400 MT/s |
| Memory types | RDIMM DDR5-5600 · RDIMM DDR5-6400 | RDIMM DDR5-6400 · RDIMM 3DS DDR5-6400 |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | R6615 | DL320 Gen12 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum bays | 16 | 20 |
| Documented layouts | 16 | 9 |
| Bay sizes | 3.5-inch · 2.5-inch · E3.S | 2.5-inch · E3.S · 3.5-inch |
| Boot devices | BOSS-N1 | HPE NS204i-u v2 480GB NVMe Hot Plug Boot Optimized Storage Device · HPE ProLiant Compute DL320 Gen12 NS204i-u Internal Cable Kit · HPE ProLiant Compute DL320 Gen12 NS204i-u GPU Internal Cable Kit + 3 more |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | R6615 | DL320 Gen12 |
|---|---|---|
| Accelerators supported | Up to 2 | Up to 4 |
| OCP slots | 1 | 2 |
| PCIe network slots | 3 | 2 |
| Network cards listed | 16 | 30 |
Power & platform
| Specification | R6615 | DL320 Gen12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power-supply options | 8 | 6 |
| Output range | 700–1,800 W | 800–2,400 W |
| Input types | AC · −48 V DC · 277 VAC / HVDC | AC · −48 V DC |
| Management | iDRAC9 | HPE iLO 7 |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | 772.13 mm with bezel / 758.29 mm without bezel (features table) | SFF 60.75 cm (23.92 in) |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
R6615: processors by cores and TDP
DL320 Gen12: processors by cores and TDP
R6615: memory with every slot filled
DL320 Gen12: memory with every slot filled
R6615: drive bays
Front panel
16 × EDSFF NVMe at the front — 16 bays in total.
DL320 Gen12: drive bays
Front panel
12 × 3.5" SAS/SATA at the front — 12 bays in total.
R6615: power supplies
DL320 Gen12: power supplies
R6615 vs DL320 Gen12, answered
Is the R6615 or the DL320 Gen12 the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The R6615 lists 23 processors up to 128 cores at 400 W; the DL320 Gen12 lists 32 up to 144 cores at 350 W. Fully populated that is 128 cores against 144.
Which holds more memory?
The R6615 has 12 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 3 TB. The DL320 Gen12 has 16 and 4 TB.
Which takes more drives?
R6615: 16 bays across 16 documented layouts. DL320 Gen12: 20 across 9. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
R6615: up to 2 accelerators, 0 double-wide cards listed. DL320 Gen12: up to 4, 0 double-wide listed.
Do they share any processors?
No. The two documents list different processors, so a like-for-like processor build is not possible across these two.
Where these figures come from. R6615: Dell PowerEdge R6615 Technical Guide (July 2026, Rev. A07) (Dell document). DL320 Gen12: HPE ProLiant Compute DL320 Gen12 QuickSpecs (Version 20 - 08-Sep-2026) (HPE document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Other comparisons in this class
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.

