Dell R770AP vs HPE DL385 Gen11
A specification-by-specification comparison of the Dell PowerEdge R770AP and the HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11, built from Dell’s and HPE’s own documents. 1 headline measure favours the R770AP, 5 favour the DL385 Gen11, and they share no processors.
Bottom line. DL385 Gen11 leads on virtualisation, databases and in-memory work, storage density, AI and acceleration, network throughput. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.
The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the R770AP if…
- Largest power supply: 3,200 W against 2,200 W on the DL385 Gen11
- Up to 128 P-cores and 504 MB of cache per socket, with 72- and 96-core parts for workloads that favour clock speed over core count.
Choose the DL385 Gen11 if…
- Cores, fully populated: 320 against 256 on the R770AP
- Memory ceiling: 6 TB against 3 TB on the R770AP
- Drive bays: 48 against 32 on the R770AP
- A dedicated GPU chassis takes four double-wide cards — 600 W H200 NVL and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell included — or eight single-wide L4s.
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | R770AP | DL385 Gen11 |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 5 | 39 |
| Most cores per processor | 128 | 160 |
| Highest processor TDP | 500 W | 400 W |
| Processor families | Xeon 6 6900P | AMD EPYC 9004 · AMD EPYC 9005 |
| Single-processor option | No | Yes |
Memory
| Specification | R770AP | DL385 Gen11 |
|---|---|---|
| Largest module listed | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory types | RDIMM DDR5-6400 | RDIMM DDR5-4800 · RDIMM DDR5-6400 |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | R770AP | DL385 Gen11 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum bays | 32 | 48 |
| Documented layouts | 4 | 15 |
| Bay sizes | 2.5-inch · E3.S | 3.5-inch · 2.5-inch · E3.S |
| Boot devices | BOSS-N1 DC-MHS (optional, rear) | HPE NS204i-u Gen11 NVMe Hot Plug Boot Optimized Storage Device · HPE NS204i-u v2 480GB NVMe Hot Plug Boot Optimized Storage Device · HPE ProLiant DL3X5 Gen11 NS204i-u NVMe Hot Plug Boot Device Cable Kit + 2 more |
| Storage controllers | 1 | 10 |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | R770AP | DL385 Gen11 |
|---|---|---|
| Accelerators supported | None listed | Up to 8 |
| Double-wide cards listed | 0 | 4 |
| PCIe network slots | 5 | 8 |
| Network cards listed | 12 | 30 |
Power & platform
| Specification | R770AP | DL385 Gen11 |
|---|---|---|
| Output range | 1,500–3,200 W | 800–2,200 W |
| Management | iDRAC10 | HPE iLO 6 |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | — | SFF/EDSFF CTO 68.89 cm (27.12 in) |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
R770AP: processors by cores and TDP
DL385 Gen11: processors by cores and TDP
R770AP: memory with every slot filled
DL385 Gen11: memory with every slot filled
R770AP: drive bays
Front panel
32 × EDSFF NVMe at the front — 32 bays in total.
DL385 Gen11: drive bays
Front panel
48 × 2.5" SAS/SATA + NVMe at the front — 48 bays in total.
R770AP: power supplies
DL385 Gen11: power supplies
R770AP vs DL385 Gen11, answered
Is the R770AP or the DL385 Gen11 the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The R770AP lists 5 processors up to 128 cores at 500 W; the DL385 Gen11 lists 39 up to 160 cores at 400 W. Fully populated that is 256 cores against 320.
Which holds more memory?
The R770AP has 24 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 3 TB. The DL385 Gen11 has 24 and 6.0 TB.
Which takes more drives?
R770AP: 32 bays across 4 documented layouts. DL385 Gen11: 48 across 15. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
R770AP: no accelerator option in its document. DL385 Gen11: up to 8, 4 double-wide listed.
Do they share any processors?
No. The two documents list different processors, so a like-for-like processor build is not possible across these two.
Where these figures come from. R770AP: Dell PowerEdge R770AP Technical Guide (May 2026) (Dell document). DL385 Gen11: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 QuickSpecs (Version 47 - 08-Sep-2026) (HPE document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Other comparisons in this class
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.

