Dell T160 vs Lenovo ST250 V3
A specification-by-specification comparison of the Dell PowerEdge T160 and the Lenovo ThinkSystem ST250 V3, built from Dell’s and Lenovo’s own documents. 1 headline measure favours the T160, 4 favour the ST250 V3, and 18 processors appear in both lists.
Bottom line. T160 leads on virtualisation. ST250 V3 leads on storage density, AI and acceleration, network throughput. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.

The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the T160 if…
- Cores, fully populated: 12 against 8 on the ST250 V3
- Compact and quiet: 132.52 mm wide, 11.64 kg fully loaded, and measured at 28–29 dB at the bystander position in Dell’s idle and operating tests at 25 °C.
Choose the ST250 V3 if…
- Drive bays: 16 against 5 on the T160
- Accelerators: Up to 1 against None listed on the T160
- Largest power supply: 800 W against 500 W on the T160
- Built for the office floor: Lenovo declares 30.5 dBA idle and 33.2 dBA at full processor load for its typical configuration.
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | T160 | ST250 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 19 | 18 |
| Most cores per processor | 12 | 8 |
| Processor families | Xeon 6300 · Xeon E-2400 · Pentium | Pentium · Xeon E-2400 · Xeon 6300 |
Memory
| Specification | T160 | ST250 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory types | ECC UDIMM DDR5-5600 | ECC UDIMM DDR5 (TruDDR5) 4800/5600 MHz, operates at 4400 MHz max |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | T160 | ST250 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum bays | 5 | 16 |
| Documented layouts | 3 | 6 |
| Bay sizes | 3.5-inch | 2.5-inch · 3.5-inch |
| Boot devices | BOSS-N1 (HW RAID, 2 x M.2 SSD; internal slot) · Internal USB 3.2 Gen1 | ThinkSystem M.2 SATA/x4 NVMe 2-Bay Adapter (BM8X, software RAID) in slot 4 · ThinkSystem M.2 RAID B540i-2i SATA/NVMe Adapter (BYFF, hardware RAID 0/1 via SAS3808N) in slot 4 · M.2 cable kit 4Z57A88898 (dummy PCIe card + cables); M.2 mutually exclusive with optical drives |
| Storage controllers | 5 | 3 |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | T160 | ST250 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Accelerators supported | None listed | Up to 1 |
| PCIe network slots | 2 | 4 |
| Network cards listed | 5 | 7 |
Power & platform
| Specification | T160 | ST250 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power-supply options | 2 | 4 |
| Output range | 300–500 W | 300–800 W |
| Management | iDRAC9 | XClarity Controller 2 |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | 3U tower (mini-tower): height 332.5 mm with feet / 329.5 mm without | 578 mm |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
T160: processors by cores and TDP
ST250 V3: processors by cores and TDP
T160: memory with every slot filled
ST250 V3: memory with every slot filled
T160: drive bays
Front panel
5 × 3.5" SAS/SATA + NVMe at the front — 5 bays in total.
ST250 V3: drive bays
Front panel
8 × 2.5" SAS/SATA at the front — 8 bays in total.
T160: power supplies
ST250 V3: power supplies
18 processors you can order in either
Both vendor documents list these parts, so a build can be matched across the two and the comparison comes down to the chassis: 1 more are exclusive to the T160 and 0 to the ST250 V3.
| Processor | Cores | TDP |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Xeon 6369P | 8 | 95 W |
| Intel Xeon 6357P | 8 | 80 W |
| Intel Xeon 6353P | 8 | 65 W |
| Intel Xeon E-2488 | 8 | 95 W |
| Intel Xeon E-2478 | 8 | 80 W |
| Intel Xeon E-2468 | 8 | 65 W |
| Intel Xeon 6349P | 6 | 95 W |
| Intel Xeon 6337P | 6 | 80 W |
| Intel Xeon 6333P | 6 | 65 W |
| Intel Xeon E-2486 | 6 | 95 W |
| Intel Xeon E-2456 | 6 | 80 W |
| Intel Xeon E-2436 | 6 | 65 W |
T160 vs ST250 V3, answered
Is the T160 or the ST250 V3 the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The T160 lists 19 processors up to 12 cores at 95 W; the ST250 V3 lists 18 up to 8 cores at 95 W. Fully populated that is 12 cores against 8.
Which holds more memory?
The T160 has 4 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 128 GB. The ST250 V3 has 4 and 128 GB.
Which takes more drives?
T160: 5 bays across 3 documented layouts. ST250 V3: 16 across 6. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
T160: no accelerator option in its document. ST250 V3: up to 1, 0 double-wide listed.
Do they share any processors?
Yes — 18 processors appear in both documents, including the Intel Xeon 6369P. That makes a like-for-like build possible on either server.
Where these figures come from. T160: Dell PowerEdge T160 Technical Guide (August 2026, Rev. A06) (Dell document). ST250 V3: Lenovo ThinkSystem ST250 V3 Server Product Guide (no revision date printed in the text export) (Lenovo document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Other comparisons in this class
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.
