Dell R670 vs HPE DL360 Gen11
A specification-by-specification comparison of the Dell PowerEdge R670 and the HPE ProLiant DL360 Gen11, built from Dell’s and HPE’s own documents. 2 headline measures favour the R670, 1 favours the DL360 Gen11, and they share no processors.
Bottom line. R670 leads on virtualisation, storage density. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.
The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the R670 if…
- Cores, fully populated: 288 against 128 on the DL360 Gen11
- Drive bays: 22 against 20 on the DL360 Gen11
- Up to 144 E-cores per socket — 288 cores in one rack unit — or 86 P-cores where per-core speed matters, all from one list of 23 processors.
Choose the DL360 Gen11 if…
- Largest power supply: 2,200 W against 1,800 W on the R670
- Two sockets and 32 DIMM slots in one rack unit: up to 64 cores per processor and 8 TB of DDR5, with 4 TB behind each socket.
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | R670 | DL360 Gen11 |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 23 | 58 |
| Most cores per processor | 144 | 64 |
| Highest processor TDP | 350 W | 385 W |
| Processor families | Xeon 6 E-core · Xeon 6 P-core | 5th Gen Xeon Scalable · 4th Gen Xeon Scalable |
| Single-processor option | No | Yes |
Memory
| Specification | R670 | DL360 Gen11 |
|---|---|---|
| Fastest rated speed | 6,400 MT/s | 5,600 MT/s |
| Memory types | RDIMM DDR5-6400 | RDIMM DDR5-5600 · RDIMM DDR5-4800 |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | R670 | DL360 Gen11 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum bays | 22 | 20 |
| Documented layouts | 8 | 5 |
| Bay sizes | E3.S · 2.5-inch | 3.5-inch · 2.5-inch · E3.S |
| Boot devices | BOSS-N1 DC-MHS (HW RAID 1, 2 x M.2 NVMe SSD 480 GB or 960 GB) · M.2 Interposer board (DC-MHS): 2 x M.2 NVMe SSDs · Internal USB | HPE NS204i-u Gen11 NVMe Hot Plug Boot Optimized Storage Device · HPE NS204i-u v2 960GB NVMe Hot Plug Boot Optimized Storage Device · HPE NS204i-u v2 960GB NVMe SED Hot Plug Boot Optimized Storage Device + 3 more |
| Storage controllers | 5 | 14 |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | R670 | DL360 Gen11 |
|---|---|---|
| Network cards listed | 14 | 39 |
Power & platform
| Specification | R670 | DL360 Gen11 |
|---|---|---|
| Power-supply options | 8 | 7 |
| Output range | 800–1,800 W | 500–2,200 W |
| Input types | AC · 277 VAC / HVDC | AC · −48 V DC |
| Management | iDRAC10 | HPE iLO 6 |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | 815.14 mm without bezel (rear I/O) / 829.44 mm without bezel (front I/O) | 8+2 SFF: 75.31 cm (29.65 in) |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
R670: processors by cores and TDP
DL360 Gen11: processors by cores and TDP
R670: memory with every slot filled
DL360 Gen11: memory with every slot filled
R670: drive bays
Front panel
20 × EDSFF NVMe at the front — 20 bays in total.
DL360 Gen11: drive bays
Front panel
20 × EDSFF NVMe at the front — 20 bays in total.
R670: power supplies
DL360 Gen11: power supplies
R670 vs DL360 Gen11, answered
Is the R670 or the DL360 Gen11 the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The R670 lists 23 processors up to 144 cores at 350 W; the DL360 Gen11 lists 58 up to 64 cores at 385 W. Fully populated that is 288 cores against 128.
Which holds more memory?
The R670 has 32 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 8 TB. The DL360 Gen11 has 32 and 8.0 TB.
Which takes more drives?
R670: 22 bays across 8 documented layouts. DL360 Gen11: 20 across 5. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
R670: up to 3 accelerators, 0 double-wide cards listed. DL360 Gen11: up to 3, 0 double-wide listed.
Do they share any processors?
No. The two documents list different processors, so a like-for-like processor build is not possible across these two.
Where these figures come from. R670: Dell PowerEdge R670 Technical Guide (May 2026, Rev. A07) (Dell document). DL360 Gen11: HPE ProLiant DL360 Gen11 QuickSpecs (Version 48 - 08-Sep-2026) (HPE document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Other comparisons in this class
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.

