Dell R6715 vs HPE DL325 Gen11
A specification-by-specification comparison of the Dell PowerEdge R6715 and the HPE ProLiant DL325 Gen11, built from Dell’s and HPE’s own documents. 3 headline measures favour the R6715, 2 favour the DL325 Gen11, and 17 processors appear in both lists.
Bottom line. R6715 leads on virtualisation, databases and in-memory work, storage density, network throughput. DL325 Gen11 leads on AI and acceleration. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.
The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the R6715 if…
- Memory ceiling: 6 TB against 3 TB on the DL325 Gen11
- Drive bays: 22 against 20 on the DL325 Gen11
- Fastest network option: 400 GbE class against 200 GbE class on the DL325 Gen11
- One socket reaches 160 Zen 5 cores with the EPYC 9845; Dell’s 18-processor list starts at the 8-core, 125 W EPYC 9015 and tops out at 400 W.
Choose the DL325 Gen11 if…
- Accelerators: Up to 4 against Up to 3 on the R6715
- Largest power supply: 2,200 W against 1,800 W on the R6715
- Both EPYC generations in one chassis: HPE’s tables list 21 5th Gen and 19 4th Gen processors, from the 8-core 9015 to the 160-core 9845, including the 9684X with 1,150 MB of L3.
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | R6715 | DL325 Gen11 |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 18 | 40 |
| Processor families | AMD EPYC 9005 | AMD EPYC 9005 · AMD EPYC 9004 |
Memory
| Specification | R6715 | DL325 Gen11 |
|---|---|---|
| DIMM slots | 24 | 12 |
| Slots per processor | 24 | 12 |
| Memory types | RDIMM DDR5-6400 (runs at 5200 MT/s 1DPC / 4400-4000 MT/s 2DPC) | RDIMM DDR5-6400 · RDIMM DDR5-4800 · 3DS RDIMM DDR5-6400 |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | R6715 | DL325 Gen11 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum bays | 22 | 20 |
| Bay sizes | 3.5-inch · 2.5-inch · E3.S | 2.5-inch · 3.5-inch · E3.S |
| Boot devices | BOSS-N1 DC-MHS · Internal USB | HPE NS204i-u Gen11 NVMe Hot Plug Boot Optimized Storage Device · HPE NS204i-u v2 480GB NVMe Hot Plug Boot Optimized Storage Device · HPE NS204i-u v2 960GB NVMe Hot Plug Boot Optimized Storage Device + 2 more |
| Storage controllers | 5 | 12 |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | R6715 | DL325 Gen11 |
|---|---|---|
| Accelerators supported | Up to 3 | Up to 4 |
| PCIe network slots | 3 | 2 |
| Network cards listed | 16 | 33 |
Power & platform
| Specification | R6715 | DL325 Gen11 |
|---|---|---|
| Power-supply options | 8 | 6 |
| Output range | 800–1,800 W | 500–2,200 W |
| Input types | AC · 277 VAC / HVDC | AC · −48 V DC |
| Management | iDRAC10 | HPE iLO 6 |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | 815.141 mm without bezel / 816.921 mm with bezel | 8SFF: 64.94 cm (25.57 in) |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
R6715: processors by cores and TDP
DL325 Gen11: processors by cores and TDP
R6715: memory with every slot filled
DL325 Gen11: memory with every slot filled
R6715: drive bays
Front panel
20 × EDSFF NVMe at the front — 20 bays in total.
DL325 Gen11: drive bays
Front panel
20 × EDSFF NVMe at the front — 20 bays in total.
R6715: power supplies
DL325 Gen11: power supplies
17 processors you can order in either
Both vendor documents list these parts, so a build can be matched across the two and the comparison comes down to the chassis: 1 more are exclusive to the R6715 and 23 to the DL325 Gen11.
| Processor | Cores | TDP |
|---|---|---|
| AMD EPYC 9845 | 160 | 390 W |
| AMD EPYC 9825 | 144 | 390 W |
| AMD EPYC 9745 | 128 | 400 W |
| AMD EPYC 9655P | 96 | 400 W |
| AMD EPYC 9555P | 64 | 360 W |
| AMD EPYC 9575F | 64 | 400 W |
| AMD EPYC 9535 | 64 | 300 W |
| AMD EPYC 9475F | 48 | 400 W |
| AMD EPYC 9375F | 32 | 320 W |
| AMD EPYC 9335 | 32 | 210 W |
| AMD EPYC 9355P | 32 | 280 W |
| AMD EPYC 9275F | 24 | 320 W |
R6715 vs DL325 Gen11, answered
Is the R6715 or the DL325 Gen11 the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The R6715 lists 18 processors up to 160 cores at 400 W; the DL325 Gen11 lists 40 up to 160 cores at 400 W. Fully populated that is 160 cores against 160.
Which holds more memory?
The R6715 has 24 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 6 TB. The DL325 Gen11 has 12 and 3.0 TB.
Which takes more drives?
R6715: 22 bays across 8 documented layouts. DL325 Gen11: 20 across 8. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
R6715: up to 3 accelerators, 0 double-wide cards listed. DL325 Gen11: up to 4, 0 double-wide listed.
Do they share any processors?
Yes — 17 processors appear in both documents, including the AMD EPYC 9845. That makes a like-for-like build possible on either server.
Where these figures come from. R6715: Dell PowerEdge R6715 Technical Guide (June 2026) (Dell document). DL325 Gen11: HPE ProLiant DL325 Gen11 QuickSpecs (Version 40 - 03-Aug-2026) (HPE document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Other comparisons in this class
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.

