Dell R6715 vs Lenovo SR635 V3
A specification-by-specification comparison of the Dell PowerEdge R6715 and the Lenovo ThinkSystem SR635 V3, built from Dell’s and Lenovo’s own documents. 2 headline measures favour the R6715, 1 favours the SR635 V3, and 18 processors appear in both lists.
Bottom line. R6715 leads on virtualisation, databases and in-memory work, storage density. SR635 V3 leads on AI and acceleration. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.

The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the R6715 if…
- Memory ceiling: 6 TB against 3 TB on the SR635 V3
- Drive bays: 22 against 16 on the SR635 V3
- One socket reaches 160 Zen 5 cores with the EPYC 9845; Dell’s 18-processor list starts at the 8-core, 125 W EPYC 9015 and tops out at 400 W.
Choose the SR635 V3 if…
- Accelerators: Up to 5 against Up to 3 on the R6715
- All twelve DDR5 channels belong to the one processor, so a single socket still reaches 3 TB with 256 GB 3DS RDIMMs, and 5th Gen EPYC can clock that memory at up to 6400 MHz.
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | R6715 | SR635 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 18 | 45 |
| Processor families | AMD EPYC 9005 | AMD EPYC 9005 · AMD EPYC 9004 |
Memory
| Specification | R6715 | SR635 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| DIMM slots | 24 | 12 |
| Slots per processor | 24 | 12 |
| Memory types | RDIMM DDR5-6400 (runs at 5200 MT/s 1DPC / 4400-4000 MT/s 2DPC) | RDIMM DDR5-6400 (5th Gen EPYC) · RDIMM DDR5-4800 (4th Gen EPYC) · 9x4 RDIMM · 3DS RDIMM DDR5-6400 |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | R6715 | SR635 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum bays | 22 | 16 |
| Documented layouts | 8 | 14 |
| Bay sizes | 3.5-inch · 2.5-inch · E3.S | 2.5-inch · E3.S |
| Boot devices | BOSS-N1 DC-MHS · Internal USB | M.2 SATA/NVMe 2-Bay Enablement Kit (4Y37A09738) · M.2 SATA/x4 NVMe 2-Bay Adapter (4Y37A79663) · M.2 NVMe 2-Bay RAID Adapter (4Y37A09750) + 1 more |
| Storage controllers | 5 | 17 |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | R6715 | SR635 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Accelerators supported | Up to 3 | Up to 5 |
| OCP slots | 2 | 1 |
| PCIe network slots | 3 | 5 |
| Network cards listed | 16 | 30 |
Power & platform
| Specification | R6715 | SR635 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Output range | 800–1,800 W | 750–1,800 W |
| Input types | AC · 277 VAC / HVDC | AC · −48 V DC |
| Management | iDRAC10 | XClarity Controller 2 |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | 815.141 mm without bezel / 816.921 mm with bezel | — |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
R6715: processors by cores and TDP
SR635 V3: processors by cores and TDP
R6715: memory with every slot filled
SR635 V3: memory with every slot filled
R6715: drive bays
Front panel
20 × EDSFF NVMe at the front — 20 bays in total.
SR635 V3: drive bays
Front panel
16 × EDSFF NVMe at the front — 16 bays in total.
R6715: power supplies
SR635 V3: power supplies
18 processors you can order in either
Both vendor documents list these parts, so a build can be matched across the two and the comparison comes down to the chassis: 0 more are exclusive to the R6715 and 27 to the SR635 V3.
| Processor | Cores | TDP |
|---|---|---|
| AMD EPYC 9845 | 160 | 390 W |
| AMD EPYC 9825 | 144 | 390 W |
| AMD EPYC 9745 | 128 | 400 W |
| AMD EPYC 9655P | 96 | 400 W |
| AMD EPYC 9555P | 64 | 360 W |
| AMD EPYC 9575F | 64 | 400 W |
| AMD EPYC 9535 | 64 | 300 W |
| AMD EPYC 9475F | 48 | 400 W |
| AMD EPYC 9455 | 48 | 300 W |
| AMD EPYC 9375F | 32 | 320 W |
| AMD EPYC 9335 | 32 | 210 W |
| AMD EPYC 9355P | 32 | 280 W |
R6715 vs SR635 V3, answered
Is the R6715 or the SR635 V3 the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The R6715 lists 18 processors up to 160 cores at 400 W; the SR635 V3 lists 45 up to 160 cores at 400 W. Fully populated that is 160 cores against 160.
Which holds more memory?
The R6715 has 24 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 6 TB. The SR635 V3 has 12 and 3 TB.
Which takes more drives?
R6715: 22 bays across 8 documented layouts. SR635 V3: 16 across 14. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
R6715: up to 3 accelerators, 0 double-wide cards listed. SR635 V3: up to 5, 0 double-wide listed.
Do they share any processors?
Yes — 18 processors appear in both documents, including the AMD EPYC 9845. That makes a like-for-like build possible on either server.
Where these figures come from. R6715: Dell PowerEdge R6715 Technical Guide (June 2026) (Dell document). SR635 V3: Lenovo ThinkSystem SR635 V3 Server Product Guide (publication date is not printed in the text export; guide contains ‘New as of July 2026’ notes) (Lenovo document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Other comparisons in this class
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.
