Dell R760xa vs Dell R760xd2
A specification-by-specification comparison of the Dell PowerEdge R760xa and the Dell PowerEdge R760xd2, built from Dell’s own documents. 5 headline measures favour the R760xa, 1 favours the R760xd2, and 8 processors appear in both lists.
Bottom line. R760xa leads on virtualisation, databases and in-memory work, AI and acceleration, network throughput. R760xd2 leads on storage density. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.
The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the R760xa if…
- Cores, fully populated: 128 against 64 on the R760xd2
- Memory ceiling: 8 TB against 1.5 TB on the R760xd2
- Accelerators: Up to 12 against Up to 2 on the R760xd2
- Twelve PCIe Gen5 slot positions in 2U: eight single-wide or four double-wide at the front, plus four full-height x16 slots at the rear for fabric or storage adapters.
Choose the R760xd2 if…
- Drive bays: 28 against 8 on the R760xa
- Twenty-four 3.5-inch bays inside 2U — twelve at the front, twelve in a mid-bay drawer — plus a rear module for four 3.5-inch SAS/SATA drives or NVMe instead (4 × 2.5-inch in carriers, 2 × U.2 or 4 × E3.S).
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | R760xa | R760xd2 |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 30 | 15 |
| Most cores per processor | 64 | 32 |
| Highest processor TDP | 350 W | 185 W |
| Single-processor option | No | Yes |
Memory
| Specification | R760xa | R760xd2 |
|---|---|---|
| DIMM slots | 32 | 16 |
| Slots per processor | 16 | 8 |
| Largest module listed | 256 GB | 96 GB |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | R760xa | R760xd2 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum bays | 8 | 28 |
| Documented layouts | 5 | 6 |
| Bay sizes | 2.5-inch · E3.S | 3.5-inch |
| Boot devices | BOSS-N1 | BOSS-N1 (M.2) |
| Storage controllers | 10 | 8 |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | R760xa | R760xd2 |
|---|---|---|
| Accelerators supported | Up to 12 | Up to 2 |
| Double-wide cards listed | 2 | 1 |
| PCIe network slots | 12 | 5 |
| Network cards listed | 13 | 12 |
Power & platform
| Specification | R760xa | R760xd2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power-supply options | 3 | 7 |
| Output range | 2,400–3,200 W | 700–1,800 W |
| Input types | AC · 277 VAC / HVDC | AC · 277 VAC / HVDC · −48 V DC |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | 946.73 mm with bezel / 932.89 mm without bezel (Table 23: Zb 875.3 mm, Zc 910.89 mm) | 837 mm (872.74 mm ear to PSU handle) |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
R760xa: processors by cores and TDP
R760xd2: processors by cores and TDP
R760xa: memory with every slot filled
R760xd2: memory with every slot filled
R760xa: drive bays
Front panel
8 × 2.5" SAS/SATA at the front — 8 bays in total.
R760xd2: drive bays
Front panel
36 × 3.5" SAS/SATA at the front — 36 bays in total.
R760xa: power supplies
R760xd2: power supplies
8 processors you can order in either
Both vendor documents list these parts, so a build can be matched across the two and the comparison comes down to the chassis: 22 more are exclusive to the R760xa and 7 to the R760xd2.
| Processor | Cores | TDP |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Xeon Gold 5418Y | 24 | 185 W |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ | 20 | 165 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6426Y | 16 | 185 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 5416S | 16 | 150 W |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4514Y | 16 | 150 W |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y | 12 | 150 W |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4510 | 12 | 150 W |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4509Y | 8 | 125 W |
R760xa vs R760xd2, answered
Is the R760xa or the R760xd2 the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The R760xa lists 30 processors up to 64 cores at 350 W; the R760xd2 lists 15 up to 32 cores at 185 W. Fully populated that is 128 cores against 64.
Which holds more memory?
The R760xa has 32 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 8 TB. The R760xd2 has 16 and 1.5 TB.
Which takes more drives?
R760xa: 8 bays across 5 documented layouts. R760xd2: 28 across 6. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
R760xa: up to 12 accelerators, 2 double-wide cards listed. R760xd2: up to 2, 1 double-wide listed.
Do they share any processors?
Yes — 8 processors appear in both documents, including the Intel Xeon Gold 5418Y. That makes a like-for-like build possible on either server.
Where these figures come from. R760xa: Dell PowerEdge R760xa Technical Guide (June 2026, Rev. A06) (Dell document). R760xd2: Dell PowerEdge R760xd2 Technical Guide (June 2026, Rev. A07) (Dell document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Other comparisons in this class
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.

