Dell R760 vs Dell R760xa
A specification-by-specification comparison of the Dell PowerEdge R760 and the Dell PowerEdge R760xa, built from Dell’s own documents. 2 headline measures favour the R760, 1 favours the R760xa, and 29 processors appear in both lists.
Bottom line. R760 leads on storage density, network throughput. R760xa leads on AI and acceleration. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.
The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the R760 if…
- Drive bays: 28 against 8 on the R760xa
- Fastest network option: 200 GbE class against 100 GbE class on the R760xa
- Dell documents 51 processor SKUs, 31 drive-bay layouts and 10 power supplies for this one chassis — far more choice than the R760xs, R760xd2 or R760xa siblings.
Choose the R760xa if…
- Accelerators: Up to 12 against Up to 6 on the R760
- Twelve PCIe Gen5 slot positions in 2U: eight single-wide or four double-wide at the front, plus four full-height x16 slots at the rear for fabric or storage adapters.
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | R760 | R760xa |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 51 | 30 |
| Processor families | Xeon Max (HBM) · 4th Gen Xeon Scalable · 5th Gen Xeon Scalable | 4th Gen Xeon Scalable · 5th Gen Xeon Scalable |
| Single-processor option | Yes | No |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | R760 | R760xa |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum bays | 28 | 8 |
| Documented layouts | 30 | 5 |
| Bay sizes | 3.5-inch · 2.5-inch · E3.S | 2.5-inch · E3.S |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | R760 | R760xa |
|---|---|---|
| Accelerators supported | Up to 6 | Up to 12 |
| Double-wide cards listed | 9 | 2 |
| PCIe network slots | 8 | 12 |
| Network cards listed | 28 | 13 |
Power & platform
| Specification | R760 | R760xa |
|---|---|---|
| Power-supply options | 10 | 3 |
| Output range | 700–3,200 W | 2,400–3,200 W |
| Input types | AC · 277 VAC / HVDC · −48 V DC | AC · 277 VAC / HVDC |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | 772.13 mm with bezel / 758.29 mm without bezel | 946.73 mm with bezel / 932.89 mm without bezel (Table 23: Zb 875.3 mm, Zc 910.89 mm) |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
R760: processors by cores and TDP
R760xa: processors by cores and TDP
R760: memory with every slot filled
R760xa: memory with every slot filled
R760: drive bays
Front panel
Rear module
24 × 2.5" SAS/SATA at the front, plus 4 × 2.5" SAS/SATA at the rear — 28 bays in total.
R760xa: drive bays
Front panel
8 × 2.5" SAS/SATA at the front — 8 bays in total.
R760: power supplies
R760xa: power supplies
29 processors you can order in either
Both vendor documents list these parts, so a build can be matched across the two and the comparison comes down to the chassis: 22 more are exclusive to the R760 and 1 to the R760xa.
| Processor | Cores | TDP |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ | 64 | 350 W |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8580 | 60 | 350 W |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8480+ | 56 | 350 W |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8470Q | 52 | 350 W |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8470 | 52 | 350 W |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8468 | 48 | 350 W |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ | 48 | 350 W |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8460Y+ | 40 | 300 W |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8452Y | 36 | 300 W |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8462Y+ | 32 | 300 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6458Q | 32 | 350 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6448Y | 32 | 225 W |
R760 vs R760xa, answered
Is the R760 or the R760xa the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The R760 lists 51 processors up to 64 cores at 350 W; the R760xa lists 30 up to 64 cores at 350 W. Fully populated that is 128 cores against 128.
Which holds more memory?
The R760 has 32 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 8 TB. The R760xa has 32 and 8 TB.
Which takes more drives?
R760: 28 bays across 30 documented layouts. R760xa: 8 across 5. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
R760: up to 6 accelerators, 9 double-wide cards listed. R760xa: up to 12, 2 double-wide listed.
Do they share any processors?
Yes — 29 processors appear in both documents, including the Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+. That makes a like-for-like build possible on either server.
Where these figures come from. R760: Dell PowerEdge R760 Technical Guide (Rev. A06, June 2026) (Dell document). R760xa: Dell PowerEdge R760xa Technical Guide (June 2026, Rev. A06) (Dell document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Other comparisons in this class
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.

