Head-to-head · every figure from the vendor documents
Dell R760 vs Lenovo SR650a V4
A specification-by-specification comparison of the Dell PowerEdge R760 and the Lenovo ThinkSystem SR650a V4, built from Dell’s and Lenovo’s own documents. 1 headline measure favours the R760, 3 favour the SR650a V4, and they share no processors.
Bottom line. R760 leads on storage density. SR650a V4 leads on virtualisation, AI and acceleration, network throughput. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
2
Processor sockets
2
128
Cores, fully populated
Largest listed processor × its socket count
Higher172
8 TB
Memory ceiling
As each document states it
8 TB
28Higher
Drive bays
8
Up to 6
Accelerators
HigherUp to 8
3,200 W
Largest power supply
3,200 W
2U Rack
Rack height
2U Rack
200 GbE class
Fastest network option
Higher800 GbE class
02 — Verdict
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the R760 if…
Drive bays: 28 against 8 on the SR650a V4
Dell documents 51 processor SKUs, 31 drive-bay layouts and 10 power supplies for this one chassis — far more choice than the R760xs, R760xd2 or R760xa siblings.
Choose the SR650a V4 if…
Cores, fully populated: 172 against 128 on the R760
Accelerators: Up to 8 against Up to 6 on the R760
Fastest network option: 800 GbE class against 200 GbE class on the R760
One 2U chassis spans eight low-profile L4 cards, four double-wide cards of up to 450 W, or a pair of 600 W H200 NVL or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell GPUs, all in PCIe 5.0 front slots.
03 — By workload
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
VirtualisationR760: 128 cores with 8 TB. SR650a V4: 172 cores with 8 TB.SR650a V4
Databases & in-memoryMemory ceiling 8 TB against 8 TB, across 32 and 32 DIMM slots.Line ball
Storage density28 bays in 2U against 8 in 2U.R760
AI & acceleration6 accelerators against 8 in the vendor documents.SR650a V4
Network throughputFastest card listed: 200 GbE class against 800 GbE class.SR650a V4
04 — Specifications
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
Specification
R760
SR650a V4
Processors listed
51
27
Most cores per processor
64
86
Processor families
Xeon Max (HBM) · 4th Gen Xeon Scalable · 5th Gen Xeon Scalable
Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet
772.13 mm with bezel / 758.29 mm without bezel
924 mm (36.4 in.)
05 — The data
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
R760: processors by cores and TDP
Xeon Max (HBM) 44th Gen Xeon Scalable 335th Gen Xeon Scalable 14Bubble size = L3 cache · hover a bubble for the full SKU
SR650a V4: processors by cores and TDP
Xeon 6 P-core 27Bubble size = L3 cache · hover a bubble for the full SKU
R760: memory with every slot filled
SR650a V4: memory with every slot filled
R760: drive bays
Front panel
Rear module
24 × 2.5" SAS/SATA at the front, plus 4 × 2.5" SAS/SATA at the rear — 28 bays in total.
SAS/SATANVMeSAS/SATA + NVMe
SR650a V4: drive bays
Front panel
8 × 2.5" NVMe at the front — 8 bays in total.
SAS/SATANVMeSAS/SATA + NVMe
R760: power supplies
AC277 VAC / HVDC−48 V DC
SR650a V4: power supplies
AC277 VAC / HVDC−48 V DC
07 — Questions
R760 vs SR650a V4, answered
Is the R760 or the SR650a V4 the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The R760 lists 51 processors up to 64 cores at 350 W; the SR650a V4 lists 27 up to 86 cores at 350 W. Fully populated that is 128 cores against 172.
Which holds more memory?
The R760 has 32 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 8 TB. The SR650a V4 has 32 and 8 TB.
Which takes more drives?
R760: 28 bays across 30 documented layouts. SR650a V4: 8 across 4. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
R760: up to 6 accelerators, 9 double-wide cards listed. SR650a V4: up to 8, 4 double-wide listed.
Do they share any processors?
No. The two documents list different processors, so a like-for-like processor build is not possible across these two.
Where these figures come from. R760: Dell PowerEdge R760 Technical Guide (Rev. A06, June 2026) (Dell document). SR650a V4: Lenovo ThinkSystem SR650a V4 and SR650i V4 Servers (August 27, 2026) (Lenovo document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.