Dell R760 vs Dell R760xd2
A specification-by-specification comparison of the Dell PowerEdge R760 and the Dell PowerEdge R760xd2, built from Dell’s own documents. 5 headline measures favour the R760 and none favour the R760xd2, and 14 processors appear in both lists.
Bottom line. R760 leads on virtualisation, databases and in-memory work, AI and acceleration, network throughput. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.
The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the R760 if…
- Cores, fully populated: 128 against 64 on the R760xd2
- Memory ceiling: 8 TB against 1.5 TB on the R760xd2
- Accelerators: Up to 6 against Up to 2 on the R760xd2
- Dell documents 51 processor SKUs, 31 drive-bay layouts and 10 power supplies for this one chassis — far more choice than the R760xs, R760xd2 or R760xa siblings.
Choose the R760xd2 if…
- Twenty-four 3.5-inch bays inside 2U — twelve at the front, twelve in a mid-bay drawer — plus a rear module for four 3.5-inch SAS/SATA drives or NVMe instead (4 × 2.5-inch in carriers, 2 × U.2 or 4 × E3.S).
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | R760 | R760xd2 |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 51 | 15 |
| Most cores per processor | 64 | 32 |
| Highest processor TDP | 350 W | 185 W |
| Processor families | Xeon Max (HBM) · 4th Gen Xeon Scalable · 5th Gen Xeon Scalable | 4th Gen Xeon Scalable · 5th Gen Xeon Scalable |
Memory
| Specification | R760 | R760xd2 |
|---|---|---|
| DIMM slots | 32 | 16 |
| Slots per processor | 16 | 8 |
| Largest module listed | 256 GB | 96 GB |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | R760 | R760xd2 |
|---|---|---|
| Documented layouts | 30 | 6 |
| Bay sizes | 3.5-inch · 2.5-inch · E3.S | 3.5-inch |
| Boot devices | BOSS-N1 | BOSS-N1 (M.2) |
| Storage controllers | 10 | 8 |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | R760 | R760xd2 |
|---|---|---|
| Accelerators supported | Up to 6 | Up to 2 |
| Double-wide cards listed | 9 | 1 |
| PCIe network slots | 8 | 5 |
| Network cards listed | 28 | 12 |
Power & platform
| Specification | R760 | R760xd2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power-supply options | 10 | 7 |
| Output range | 700–3,200 W | 700–1,800 W |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | 772.13 mm with bezel / 758.29 mm without bezel | 837 mm (872.74 mm ear to PSU handle) |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
R760: processors by cores and TDP
R760xd2: processors by cores and TDP
R760: memory with every slot filled
R760xd2: memory with every slot filled
R760: drive bays
Front panel
Rear module
24 × 2.5" SAS/SATA at the front, plus 4 × 2.5" SAS/SATA at the rear — 28 bays in total.
R760xd2: drive bays
Front panel
36 × 3.5" SAS/SATA at the front — 36 bays in total.
R760: power supplies
R760xd2: power supplies
14 processors you can order in either
Both vendor documents list these parts, so a build can be matched across the two and the comparison comes down to the chassis: 37 more are exclusive to the R760 and 1 to the R760xd2.
| Processor | Cores | TDP |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Xeon Gold 6428N | 32 | 185 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 5512U | 28 | 185 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 5418Y | 24 | 185 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 5418N | 24 | 165 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 5412U | 24 | 185 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 5411N | 24 | 165 W |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ | 20 | 165 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6426Y | 16 | 185 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 5416S | 16 | 150 W |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4514Y | 16 | 150 W |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y | 12 | 150 W |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4510 | 12 | 150 W |
R760 vs R760xd2, answered
Is the R760 or the R760xd2 the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The R760 lists 51 processors up to 64 cores at 350 W; the R760xd2 lists 15 up to 32 cores at 185 W. Fully populated that is 128 cores against 64.
Which holds more memory?
The R760 has 32 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 8 TB. The R760xd2 has 16 and 1.5 TB.
Which takes more drives?
R760: 28 bays across 30 documented layouts. R760xd2: 28 across 6. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
R760: up to 6 accelerators, 9 double-wide cards listed. R760xd2: up to 2, 1 double-wide listed.
Do they share any processors?
Yes — 14 processors appear in both documents, including the Intel Xeon Gold 6428N. That makes a like-for-like build possible on either server.
Where these figures come from. R760: Dell PowerEdge R760 Technical Guide (Rev. A06, June 2026) (Dell document). R760xd2: Dell PowerEdge R760xd2 Technical Guide (June 2026, Rev. A07) (Dell document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Other comparisons in this class
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.

