Dell R760xd2 vs Dell R760xs
A specification-by-specification comparison of the Dell PowerEdge R760xd2 and the Dell PowerEdge R760xs, built from Dell’s own documents. 1 headline measure favours the R760xd2, 1 favours the R760xs, and 11 processors appear in both lists.
Bottom line. R760xd2 leads on storage density. R760xs leads on network throughput. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.
The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the R760xd2 if…
- Drive bays: 28 against 24 on the R760xs
- Twenty-four 3.5-inch bays inside 2U — twelve at the front, twelve in a mid-bay drawer — plus a rear module for four 3.5-inch SAS/SATA drives or NVMe instead (4 × 2.5-inch in carriers, 2 × U.2 or 4 × E3.S).
Choose the R760xs if…
- Fastest network option: 100 GbE class against 25 GbE class on the R760xd2
- Storage breadth the 1U siblings cannot match: 24 front 2.5-inch bays (16 SAS/SATA plus 8 NVMe, up to 244.48 TB), or 8 or 12 × 3.5-inch bays up to 288 TB.
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | R760xd2 | R760xs |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 15 | 21 |
| Highest processor TDP | 185 W | 250 W |
| Processor families | 4th Gen Xeon Scalable · 5th Gen Xeon Scalable | 5th Gen Xeon Scalable · 4th Gen Xeon Scalable |
Memory
| Specification | R760xd2 | R760xs |
|---|---|---|
| Fastest rated speed | 6,400 MT/s | 5,600 MT/s |
| Memory types | RDIMM DDR5-4800 · RDIMM DDR5-5600 · RDIMM DDR5-6400 | RDIMM DDR5-4800 · RDIMM DDR5-5600 |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | R760xd2 | R760xs |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum bays | 28 | 24 |
| Documented layouts | 6 | 7 |
| Bay sizes | 3.5-inch | 3.5-inch · 2.5-inch |
| Boot devices | BOSS-N1 (M.2) | BOSS-N1 (HW RAID, 2 x M.2 NVMe 480 GB / 960 GB, RAID0/RAID1, front-facing hot-plug) · Internal USB 3.0 (optional) |
| Storage controllers | 8 | 9 |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | R760xd2 | R760xs |
|---|---|---|
| Double-wide cards listed | 1 | 0 |
| PCIe network slots | 5 | 6 |
| Network cards listed | 12 | 27 |
Power & platform
| Specification | R760xd2 | R760xs |
|---|---|---|
| Power-supply options | 7 | 9 |
| Output range | 700–1,800 W | 600–1,800 W |
| Input types | AC · 277 VAC / HVDC · −48 V DC | AC · −48 V DC · 277 VAC / HVDC |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | 837 mm (872.74 mm ear to PSU handle) | 685.78 mm ear to PSU handle (650.24 mm ear to PSU surface) |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
R760xd2: processors by cores and TDP
R760xs: processors by cores and TDP
R760xd2: memory with every slot filled
R760xs: memory with every slot filled
R760xd2: drive bays
Front panel
36 × 3.5" SAS/SATA at the front — 36 bays in total.
R760xs: drive bays
Front panel
24 × 2.5" SAS/SATA + NVMe at the front — 24 bays in total.
R760xd2: power supplies
R760xs: power supplies
11 processors you can order in either
Both vendor documents list these parts, so a build can be matched across the two and the comparison comes down to the chassis: 4 more are exclusive to the R760xd2 and 10 to the R760xs.
| Processor | Cores | TDP |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Xeon Gold 5512U | 28 | 185 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 5418Y | 24 | 185 W |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4516Y+ | 24 | 185 W |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ | 20 | 165 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6426Y | 16 | 185 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 5416S | 16 | 150 W |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4514Y | 16 | 150 W |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y | 12 | 150 W |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4510 | 12 | 150 W |
| Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | 8 | 150 W |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4509Y | 8 | 125 W |
R760xd2 vs R760xs, answered
Is the R760xd2 or the R760xs the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The R760xd2 lists 15 processors up to 32 cores at 185 W; the R760xs lists 21 up to 32 cores at 250 W. Fully populated that is 64 cores against 64.
Which holds more memory?
The R760xd2 has 16 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 1.5 TB. The R760xs has 16 and 1.5 TB.
Which takes more drives?
R760xd2: 28 bays across 6 documented layouts. R760xs: 24 across 7. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
R760xd2: up to 2 accelerators, 1 double-wide cards listed. R760xs: up to 2, 0 double-wide listed.
Do they share any processors?
Yes — 11 processors appear in both documents, including the Intel Xeon Gold 5512U. That makes a like-for-like build possible on either server.
Where these figures come from. R760xd2: Dell PowerEdge R760xd2 Technical Guide (June 2026, Rev. A07) (Dell document). R760xs: Dell PowerEdge R760xs Technical Guide (June 2026, Rev. A04) (Dell document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Other comparisons in this class
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.

