Dell XE9685L vs Lenovo SR675 V3
A specification-by-specification comparison of the Dell PowerEdge XE9685L and the Lenovo ThinkSystem SR675 V3, built from Dell’s and Lenovo’s own documents. 2 headline measures favour the XE9685L, 2 favour the SR675 V3, and 3 processors appear in both lists.
Bottom line. SR675 V3 leads on virtualisation, databases and in-memory work, storage density. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.

The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the XE9685L if…
- Cores, fully populated: 384 against 320 on the SR675 V3
- Largest power supply: 3,000 W against 2,600 W on the SR675 V3
- The highest host core count in Dell’s 4U liquid-cooled pair: up to 192 cores per EPYC 9965, 384 cores across both sockets.
Choose the SR675 V3 if…
- Memory ceiling: 6 TB against 3 TB on the XE9685L
- Rack height: 3U Rack against 4U Rack on the XE9685L
- Eight double-wide or single-wide PCIe GPUs fit in 3U on the 8-DW base, fed either by two direct x8 risers at 1:1 or by two switched x16 risers that share each host link between two cards.
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | XE9685L | SR675 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 5 | 40 |
| Most cores per processor | 192 | 160 |
| Highest processor TDP | 500 W | 400 W |
| Processor families | AMD EPYC 9005 | AMD EPYC 9005 · AMD EPYC 9004 |
| Single-processor option | No | Yes |
Memory
| Specification | XE9685L | SR675 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Largest module listed | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory types | RDIMM DDR5-6400 | RDIMM DDR5-6400 (5th Gen EPYC) · RDIMM DDR5-4800 (4th Gen EPYC) · 3DS RDIMM DDR5-6400 |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | XE9685L | SR675 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Documented layouts | 1 | 3 |
| Bay sizes | 2.5-inch | 2.5-inch · E3.S |
| Boot devices | BOSS-N1 (2 x M.2 NVMe, HWRAID 1) | M.2 SATA/NVMe 2-Bay Enablement Kit (4Y37A09738) · M.2 SATA/x4 NVMe 2-Bay Enablement Kit (4Y37A79663) · M.2 NVMe 2-Bay RAID Enablement Kit (4Y37A09750) |
| Storage controllers | 1 | 7 |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | XE9685L | SR675 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Double-wide cards listed | 0 | 5 |
| PCIe network slots | 12 | 6 |
| Network cards listed | 9 | 25 |
Power & platform
| Specification | XE9685L | SR675 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power-supply options | 1 | 4 |
| Output range | 3,000–3,000 W | 1,800–2,600 W |
| Management | iDRAC9 | XClarity Controller 2 |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | 1025.62 mm (40.37 in) without bezel / 1037.57 mm (40.82 in) with bezel | 892 mm |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
XE9685L: processors by cores and TDP
SR675 V3: processors by cores and TDP
XE9685L: memory with every slot filled
SR675 V3: memory with every slot filled
XE9685L: drive bays
Front panel
8 × 2.5" NVMe at the front — 8 bays in total.
SR675 V3: drive bays
Front panel
8 × 2.5" SAS/SATA at the front — 8 bays in total.
XE9685L: power supplies
SR675 V3: power supplies
3 processors you can order in either
Both vendor documents list these parts, so a build can be matched across the two and the comparison comes down to the chassis: 2 more are exclusive to the XE9685L and 37 to the SR675 V3.
| Processor | Cores | TDP |
|---|---|---|
| AMD EPYC 9655 | 96 | 400 W |
| AMD EPYC 9575F | 64 | 400 W |
| AMD EPYC 9455 | 48 | 300 W |
XE9685L vs SR675 V3, answered
Is the XE9685L or the SR675 V3 the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The XE9685L lists 5 processors up to 192 cores at 500 W; the SR675 V3 lists 40 up to 160 cores at 400 W. Fully populated that is 384 cores against 320.
Which holds more memory?
The XE9685L has 24 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 3 TB. The SR675 V3 has 24 and 6 TB.
Which takes more drives?
XE9685L: 8 bays across 1 documented layouts. SR675 V3: 8 across 3. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
XE9685L: up to 8 accelerators, 0 double-wide cards listed. SR675 V3: up to 8, 5 double-wide listed.
Do they share any processors?
Yes — 3 processors appear in both documents, including the AMD EPYC 9655. That makes a like-for-like build possible on either server.
Where these figures come from. XE9685L: Dell PowerEdge XE9685L Technical Guide (Rev. A03, June 2026) (Dell document). SR675 V3: Lenovo ThinkSystem SR675 V3 and SR675i V3 Servers Product Guide (August 25, 2026) (Lenovo document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Other comparisons in this class
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.
