HPE XD685 vs Lenovo SR675 V3
A specification-by-specification comparison of the HPE ProLiant Compute XD685 and the Lenovo ThinkSystem SR675 V3, built from HPE’s and Lenovo’s own documents. 2 headline measures favour the XD685, 3 favour the SR675 V3, and 9 processors appear in both lists.
Bottom line. SR675 V3 leads on virtualisation, databases and in-memory work, storage density. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.

The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the XD685 if…
- Drive bays: 12 against 8 on the SR675 V3
- Largest power supply: 3,000 W against 2,600 W on the SR675 V3
- Four eight-GPU boards on one platform — NVIDIA HGX H200, B200 and HGX B300, or AMD Instinct MI355X — with B200, B300 and MI355X each tied to its own DLC or power kit.
Choose the SR675 V3 if…
- Cores, fully populated: 320 against 192 on the XD685
- Memory ceiling: 6 TB against 3 TB on the XD685
- Rack height: 3U Rack against 5U Rack on the XD685
- Eight double-wide or single-wide PCIe GPUs fit in 3U on the 8-DW base, fed either by two direct x8 risers at 1:1 or by two switched x16 risers that share each host link between two cards.
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | XD685 | SR675 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 9 | 40 |
| Most cores per processor | 96 | 160 |
| Processor families | AMD EPYC 9005 | AMD EPYC 9005 · AMD EPYC 9004 |
| Single-processor option | No | Yes |
Memory
| Specification | XD685 | SR675 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Largest module listed | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory types | RDIMM DDR5-6400 | RDIMM DDR5-6400 (5th Gen EPYC) · RDIMM DDR5-4800 (4th Gen EPYC) · 3DS RDIMM DDR5-6400 |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | XD685 | SR675 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum bays | 12 | 8 |
| Documented layouts | 2 | 3 |
| Bay sizes | E3.S | 2.5-inch · E3.S |
| Boot devices | HPE ProLiant Compute XD NS204i-u 960GB Boot Device (S4R99A) - 2x 480 GB M.2 NVMe RAID 1 · HPE ProLiant Compute XD NS204i-u 2x 960GB Boot Device (S6A36A) - 2x 960 GB M.2 NVMe RAID 1 | M.2 SATA/NVMe 2-Bay Enablement Kit (4Y37A09738) · M.2 SATA/x4 NVMe 2-Bay Enablement Kit (4Y37A79663) · M.2 NVMe 2-Bay RAID Enablement Kit (4Y37A09750) |
| Storage controllers | 3 | 7 |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | XD685 | SR675 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Double-wide cards listed | 0 | 5 |
| OCP slots | 0 | 1 |
| PCIe network slots | 12 | 6 |
| Network cards listed | 20 | 25 |
Power & platform
| Specification | XD685 | SR675 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power-supply options | 1 | 4 |
| Output range | 3,000–3,000 W | 1,800–2,600 W |
| Input types | −48 V DC | AC |
| Management | HPE iLO 6 | XClarity Controller 2 |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | 1049 mm (L) deep | 892 mm |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
XD685: processors by cores and TDP
SR675 V3: processors by cores and TDP
XD685: memory with every slot filled
SR675 V3: memory with every slot filled
XD685: drive bays
Front panel
8 × EDSFF NVMe at the front — 8 bays in total.
SR675 V3: drive bays
Front panel
8 × 2.5" SAS/SATA at the front — 8 bays in total.
XD685: power supplies
SR675 V3: power supplies
9 processors you can order in either
Both vendor documents list these parts, so a build can be matched across the two and the comparison comes down to the chassis: 0 more are exclusive to the XD685 and 31 to the SR675 V3.
| Processor | Cores | TDP |
|---|---|---|
| AMD EPYC 9645 | 96 | 320 W |
| AMD EPYC 9655 | 96 | 400 W |
| AMD EPYC 9565 | 72 | 400 W |
| AMD EPYC 9535 | 64 | 300 W |
| AMD EPYC 9555 | 64 | 360 W |
| AMD EPYC 9575F | 64 | 400 W |
| AMD EPYC 9455 | 48 | 300 W |
| AMD EPYC 9365 | 36 | 300 W |
| AMD EPYC 9355 | 32 | 280 W |
XD685 vs SR675 V3, answered
Is the XD685 or the SR675 V3 the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The XD685 lists 9 processors up to 96 cores at 400 W; the SR675 V3 lists 40 up to 160 cores at 400 W. Fully populated that is 192 cores against 320.
Which holds more memory?
The XD685 has 24 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 3.0 TB. The SR675 V3 has 24 and 6 TB.
Which takes more drives?
XD685: 12 bays across 2 documented layouts. SR675 V3: 8 across 3. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
XD685: up to 8 accelerators, 0 double-wide cards listed. SR675 V3: up to 8, 5 double-wide listed.
Do they share any processors?
Yes — 9 processors appear in both documents, including the AMD EPYC 9645. That makes a like-for-like build possible on either server.
Where these figures come from. XD685: HPE ProLiant Compute XD685 QuickSpecs (V15 - 03-August-2026) (HPE document). SR675 V3: Lenovo ThinkSystem SR675 V3 and SR675i V3 Servers Product Guide (August 25, 2026) (Lenovo document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Other comparisons in this class
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.
