HPE Compute XD690 vs Lenovo SR860 V3
A specification-by-specification comparison of the HPE Compute XD690 and the Lenovo ThinkSystem SR860 V3, built from HPE’s and Lenovo’s own documents. 2 headline measures favour the Compute XD690, 5 favour the SR860 V3, and they share no processors.
Bottom line. Compute XD690 leads on network throughput. SR860 V3 leads on virtualisation, databases and in-memory work, storage density. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.


The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the Compute XD690 if…
- Largest power supply: 3,200 W against 2,700 W on the SR860 V3
- Fastest network option: 400 GbE class against 200 GbE class on the SR860 V3
- Eight NVIDIA Blackwell Ultra GPUs on an HGX B300 board in a chassis designed for air-cooled infrastructure, with ARCS or a rear door heat exchanger as options.
Choose the SR860 V3 if…
- Processor sockets: 4 against 2 on the Compute XD690
- Cores, fully populated: 240 against 128 on the Compute XD690
- Memory ceiling: 16 TB against 3 TB on the Compute XD690
- Forty-eight front bays in one chassis: all SAS/SATA, or 24 SAS/SATA plus 24 AnyBay with each AnyBay bay on its own Gen5 x4 NVMe link.
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | Compute XD690 | SR860 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 2 | 10 |
| Most cores per processor | 64 | 60 |
| Processor families | Xeon 6 P-core | 4th Gen Xeon Scalable |
Memory
| Specification | Compute XD690 | SR860 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| DIMM slots | 32 | 64 |
| Largest module listed | 96 GB | 128 GB |
| Fastest rated speed | 6,400 MT/s | 5,600 MT/s |
| Memory types | RDIMM DDR5-6400 | RDIMM DDR5-4800 · 9x4 RDIMM · 3DS RDIMM |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | Compute XD690 | SR860 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum bays | 8 | 48 |
| Documented layouts | 1 | 2 |
| Bay sizes | E3.S | 2.5-inch |
| Boot devices | HPE Compute XD 1.92 TB NVMe Read Intensive M.2 2280 SSD (S6V50A), up to 2 on a single carrier card (the document does not explicitly label it a boot device) | M.2 SATA/NVMe 2-Bay Enablement Kit (4Y37A09738) · M.2 SATA/x4 NVMe 2-Bay Adapter (4Y37A79663) · M.2 NVMe 2-Bay RAID Adapter (4Y37A09750) + 1 more |
| Storage controllers | 0 | 16 |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | Compute XD690 | SR860 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| OCP slots | 0 | 2 |
| PCIe network slots | 2 | 18 |
| Network cards listed | 5 | 29 |
Power & platform
| Specification | Compute XD690 | SR860 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power-supply options | 1 | 11 |
| Output range | 3,200–3,200 W | 1,100–2,700 W |
| Input types | AC | AC · 277 VAC / HVDC · −48 V DC |
| Management | HPE Compute XD690 Baseboard Management Controller | XClarity Controller 2 |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | 800 mm (31.5 in) deep | 906 mm |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
Compute XD690: processors by cores and TDP
SR860 V3: processors by cores and TDP
Compute XD690: memory with every slot filled
SR860 V3: memory with every slot filled
Compute XD690: drive bays
Front panel
8 × EDSFF NVMe at the front — 8 bays in total.
SR860 V3: drive bays
Front panel
8 × 2.5" SAS/SATA at the front — 8 bays in total.
Compute XD690: power supplies
SR860 V3: power supplies
Compute XD690 vs SR860 V3, answered
Is the Compute XD690 or the SR860 V3 the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The Compute XD690 lists 2 processors up to 64 cores at 350 W; the SR860 V3 lists 10 up to 60 cores at 350 W. Fully populated that is 128 cores against 240.
Which holds more memory?
The Compute XD690 has 32 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 3 TB practical ceiling. The SR860 V3 has 64 and 16 TB.
Which takes more drives?
Compute XD690: 8 bays across 1 documented layouts. SR860 V3: 48 across 2. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
Compute XD690: up to 8 accelerators, 0 double-wide cards listed. SR860 V3: up to 8, 0 double-wide listed.
Do they share any processors?
No. The two documents list different processors, so a like-for-like processor build is not possible across these two.
Where these figures come from. Compute XD690: HPE Compute XD690 QuickSpecs (Version 6 - 06-July-2026) (HPE document). SR860 V3: Lenovo ThinkSystem SR860 V3 Server Product Guide (publication date is not printed in the text export) (Lenovo document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Other comparisons in this class
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.