Dell XE7745 vs Lenovo SR685a V3
A specification-by-specification comparison of the Dell PowerEdge XE7745 and the Lenovo ThinkSystem SR685a V3, built from Dell’s and Lenovo’s own documents. 5 headline measures favour the XE7745, 1 favours the SR685a V3, and 4 processors appear in both lists.
Bottom line. XE7745 leads on virtualisation, databases and in-memory work, AI and acceleration. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.

The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the XE7745 if…
- Cores, fully populated: 384 against 256 on the SR685a V3
- Memory ceiling: 6 TB against 3 TB on the SR685a V3
- Accelerators: Up to 16 against Up to 8 on the SR685a V3
- The largest host in Dell’s PCIe GPU pair: up to 192 Zen 5 cores per socket and 6 TB of DDR5, where the Intel XE7740 stops at 86 cores and 4 TB.
Choose the SR685a V3 if…
- Drive bays: 16 against 8 on the XE7745
- One chassis, two GPU ecosystems: eight AMD MI300X OAM GPUs (192 GB HBM3, 5.3 TB/s, 750 W each) or eight NVIDIA H200 SXM5 GPUs (141 GB, listed as HBM3e in the GPU table, 4.8 TB/s, 700 W each).
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | XE7745 | SR685a V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 8 | 12 |
| Most cores per processor | 192 | 128 |
| Highest processor TDP | 500 W | 400 W |
| Processor families | AMD EPYC 9005 | AMD EPYC 9005 · AMD EPYC 9004 |
Memory
| Specification | XE7745 | SR685a V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Largest module listed | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory types | RDIMM DDR5-6400 | RDIMM DDR5-6400 (5th Gen, operates 6000) · 10x4 RDIMM / RDIMM DDR5-4800 (4th Gen) · 3DS RDIMM |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | XE7745 | SR685a V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum bays | 8 | 16 |
| Bay sizes | E3.S | 2.5-inch |
| Boot devices | BOSS-N1 DC-MHS (HW RAID 1, 2 x M.2 NVMe SSD) · Internal USB | ThinkSystem M.2 NVMe 2-Bay RAID Adapter (B8P9) - Marvell 88NR2241 RAID-0/1, PCIe 3.0 x2, no SED; no field upgrade |
| Storage controllers | 1 | 2 |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | XE7745 | SR685a V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Accelerators supported | Up to 16 | Up to 8 |
| Double-wide cards listed | 5 | 0 |
| PCIe network slots | 8 | 10 |
| Network cards listed | 11 | 12 |
Power & platform
| Specification | XE7745 | SR685a V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power-supply options | 3 | 1 |
| Output range | 2,400–3,200 W | 2,600–2,600 W |
| Input types | AC · 277 VAC / HVDC | AC |
| Management | iDRAC10 | XClarity Controller 2 |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | 899.56 mm with bezel / 886.73 mm without bezel | 924 mm |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
XE7745: processors by cores and TDP
SR685a V3: processors by cores and TDP
XE7745: memory with every slot filled
SR685a V3: memory with every slot filled
XE7745: drive bays
Front panel
8 × EDSFF NVMe at the front — 8 bays in total.
SR685a V3: drive bays
Front panel
8 × 2.5" NVMe at the front — 8 bays in total.
XE7745: power supplies
SR685a V3: power supplies
4 processors you can order in either
Both vendor documents list these parts, so a build can be matched across the two and the comparison comes down to the chassis: 4 more are exclusive to the XE7745 and 8 to the SR685a V3.
| Processor | Cores | TDP |
|---|---|---|
| AMD EPYC 9655 | 96 | 400 W |
| AMD EPYC 9575F | 64 | 400 W |
| AMD EPYC 9555 | 64 | 360 W |
| AMD EPYC 9455 | 48 | 300 W |
XE7745 vs SR685a V3, answered
Is the XE7745 or the SR685a V3 the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The XE7745 lists 8 processors up to 192 cores at 500 W; the SR685a V3 lists 12 up to 128 cores at 400 W. Fully populated that is 384 cores against 256.
Which holds more memory?
The XE7745 has 24 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 6 TB. The SR685a V3 has 24 and 3 TB.
Which takes more drives?
XE7745: 8 bays across 1 documented layouts. SR685a V3: 16 across 1. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
XE7745: up to 16 accelerators, 5 double-wide cards listed. SR685a V3: up to 8, 0 double-wide listed.
Do they share any processors?
Yes — 4 processors appear in both documents, including the AMD EPYC 9655. That makes a like-for-like build possible on either server.
Where these figures come from. XE7745: Dell PowerEdge XE7745 Technical Guide (Rev. A09, September 2026) (Dell document). SR685a V3: Lenovo ThinkSystem SR685a V3 Server Product Guide (July 15, 2026) (Lenovo document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Other comparisons in this class
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.
