UK’s trusted IT infrastructure partner since 2003
sales@servnetuk.com
0800 987 4111
Servnet
ConfiguratorGet in Touch
← Comparison Tool

šŸ’¾ Dell PowerStore 3200T vs NetApp AFF A70 vs Pure FlashArray//X

AI-powered analysis across 19 matched specifications

Dell PowerStore 3200T Gen2 2U all-flash storage appliance front view
Dell PowerStore 3200T
Dell Storage
8.4
Overall Score
Best for: Mixed block and file workloads requiring substantial on-array compute for data services and predictable 5:1 data reduction
View Full Details
NetApp AFF A70 4U all-flash unified storage system front view
AFF A70
NetApp
8.5
Overall Score
Best for: Extreme-scale NAS environments, AI/ML infrastructure, and high-performance applications requiring massive throughput and 24-node scalability
View Full Details
Pure Storage FlashArray X R5 mission-critical all-flash storage array front view
FlashArray//X
Pure Storage
7.9
Overall Score
Best for: Organisations prioritising operational simplicity, consistent sub-250µs latency, and non-disruptive evergreen upgrades with unlimited snapshots
View Full Details

Performance Overview

Scores based on quantifiable specification values (1-10 scale)

ComputeMemoryStorageNetworkingExpandabilityManagement
Dell PowerStore 3200T
AFF A70
FlashArray//X
Compute
Dell PowerStore 3200T
9.5
AFF A70
7.0
FlashArray//X
7.0
Memory
Dell PowerStore 3200T
9.0
AFF A70
7.5
FlashArray//X
7.0
Storage
Dell PowerStore 3200T
8.5
AFF A70
9.0
FlashArray//X
8.0
Networking
Dell PowerStore 3200T
7.5
AFF A70
9.5
FlashArray//X
8.0
Expandability
Dell PowerStore 3200T
8.0
AFF A70
9.5
FlashArray//X
8.5
Management
Dell PowerStore 3200T
8.0
AFF A70
8.5
FlashArray//X
9.0

Detailed Specifications

Specification
Dell PowerStore 3200T
Dell Storage
AFF A70
NetApp
FlashArray//X
Pure Storage
Key Metrics
Form Factor2U rack-mountable4U chassis, 2 HA controllers3U base chassis; 3–9U with DirectFlash Shelf expansion
Max Effective Capacity (Appliance/HA Pair)5.90 PBe6.6 PB raw per HA pair (330 PB effective at 24-node scale)Up to 4.4 PB (X90 R5)
Max Effective Capacity (Cluster)23.60 PBe (4-node)330 PB (24-node NAS cluster)N/A (scales with expansion shelves)
Data Reduction Guarantee/Average5:1 guaranteedN/A5:1 average (up to 10:1 with thin provisioning)
Availability99.9999% (6-nines)99.9999% (six nines)Proven 99.9999%
LatencyN/AN/AAs low as 250µs
Peak PerformanceN/AUp to 40M IOPs / 1 TB/s throughput (cluster)N/A
Compute
Processor4 Ɨ Intel Xeon, 64 cores, 2.1 GHzN/AN/A
Memory
Controller Memory768 GB per controller node256 GB per controllerN/A
Storage
Max Drives/Slots93 NVMe SSDs48 internal NVMe SSD slotsN/A (varies by model)
Max Raw CapacityN/A6.6 PB per HA pairUp to 1,207 TB (X90 R5)
Max Volumes10,000N/AN/A
Max Snapshots200,000N/AUnlimited instant snapshots
Networking
Front-End Ports/NetworkingUp to 24 (FC 16/32Gb, iSCSI 10/25G, NVMe-oF)24Ɨ 200Gbps Ethernet, 36Ɨ 100GbE, 56Ɨ 25GbE, 56Ɨ 64Gbps NVMe/FCN/A
Software & OS Compatibility
ProtocolsFC, iSCSI, NVMe-oF, NFS, SMBNVMe/FC, NVMe/TCP, NFSv3/RDMA, NFSv4/RDMA, FC, iSCSI, NFS, SMB/CIFS, S3NVMe/FC, NVMe/RoCE, NVMe/TCP, iSCSI, FC, NFS, SMB
Software/ManagementN/ANetApp ONTAP 9.16.1 (min. 9.15.1RC2)Purity OS, Everpure Fusion, Pure1 AIOps — single unified API
Cloud IntegrationN/AN/APure Cloud Block Store (AWS, Azure); SnapMirror to cloud
Security
Security FeaturesZero Trust cybersecurity — SafeMode snapshots, anomaly detectionAI/ML ARP, SnapLock Compliance, AES-256, FIPS 140-2, government validatedSafeMode Snapshots (default), AES-256, ransomware remediation
Warranty & Support
Warranty/SupportN/AFlex hardware support — 3 or 5 year optionsEvergreen Architecture — nondisruptive data-in-place upgrades across generations
ā˜…

Expert Analysis

AI-generated based on published specifications

These three enterprise all-flash arrays represent distinct architectural approaches to modern storage challenges. The Dell PowerStore 3200T offers a balanced, compute-rich platform with 64 cores and 768GB memory per controller, making it particularly well-suited for environments requiring substantial on-array processing for data services like deduplication, compression, and replication. Its 5:1 guaranteed data reduction and 10,000 volume limit provide predictable performance for mixed block and file workloads. The NetApp AFF A70 excels in extreme scalability and high-performance networking, with a 24-node NAS cluster capability reaching 330PB effective capacity and an impressive 56Ɨ 64Gbps NVMe/FC ports. This makes it ideal for large-scale file services, AI/ML workloads (certified for NVIDIA DGX SuperPOD), and environments requiring massive parallel throughput up to 1TB/s.

The Pure Storage FlashArray//X distinguishes itself through operational simplicity and consistent low latency, with sub-250µs response times and unlimited snapshots that incur zero performance overhead. Its Evergreen architecture eliminates planned downtime through non-disruptive upgrades, while the unified management platform (Purity OS with Pure1 AIOps) reduces administrative overhead significantly. Value propositions differ substantially: Dell offers strong compute resources for data-intensive processing, NetApp provides unparalleled scale-out capabilities for massive datasets, and Pure delivers operational excellence with predictable performance and simplified lifecycle management. Organisations should prioritise the PowerStore for compute-heavy storage workloads, the AFF A70 for massive scale file services and AI infrastructure, and the FlashArray//X for environments where operational simplicity and consistent low latency are paramount.

Dell PowerStore 3200T
Best for: Mixed block and file workloads requiring substantial on-array compute for data services and predictable 5:1 data reduction
AFF A70
Best for: Extreme-scale NAS environments, AI/ML infrastructure, and high-performance applications requiring massive throughput and 24-node scalability
FlashArray//X
Best for: Organisations prioritising operational simplicity, consistent sub-250µs latency, and non-disruptive evergreen upgrades with unlimited snapshots

Ready to proceed?

Want to compare different products or add more to this comparison?

Open Interactive Comparison Tool →