Performance Overview
Scores based on quantifiable specification values (1-10 scale)
Detailed Specifications
Frequently asked questions
Which is best for unified NAS and SAN consolidation?
The NetApp AFF A70 is the only true unified system here, serving block, file and S3 on ONTAP with up to 24-node NAS scale-out. The Pure FlashArray//X and HPE Nimble AF60 are primarily block-oriented, though the //X also supports NFS and SMB.
Which platform supports end-to-end NVMe?
Both the Pure FlashArray//X R5 (NVMe DirectFlash, NVMe/FC, NVMe/RoCE, NVMe/TCP) and the NetApp AFF A70 (NVMe SSDs, NVMe/FC, NVMe/TCP) are end-to-end NVMe. The HPE Nimble AF60 uses SAS/SATA SSDs and is not an NVMe platform.
What are the key capacity differences?
The AF60 tops out at 553 TB raw / ~2 PB effective per array, the FlashArray//X90 R5 reaches 1,207 TB raw / 4.4 PB effective, and the AFF A70 scales to 6.6 PB raw per HA pair and up to 330 PB effective across a 24-node cluster.
Should refresh timing influence the choice?
Yes. The HPE Nimble AF60 is an older design with published end-of-service-life dates around 2028, whereas the Pure FlashArray//X R5 and NetApp AFF A70 are current-generation NVMe systems better suited to a long-horizon investment. Servnet can quote all three.
Ready to proceed?
Want to compare different products or add more to this comparison?
Open Interactive Comparison Tool →Choose controllers, drive mix, capacity and host connectivity, and we quote the exact configuration. UK stock, real lead times.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads featuring these models — useful if you’re still shortlisting.
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.


