Dell XE9680L vs Lenovo SR860 V3
A specification-by-specification comparison of the Dell PowerEdge XE9680L and the Lenovo ThinkSystem SR860 V3, built from Dell’s and Lenovo’s own documents. 2 headline measures favour the XE9680L, 4 favour the SR860 V3, and they share no processors.
Bottom line. XE9680L leads on network throughput. SR860 V3 leads on virtualisation, databases and in-memory work, storage density. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.


The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the XE9680L if…
- Largest power supply: 3,000 W against 2,700 W on the SR860 V3
- Fastest network option: 400 GbE class against 200 GbE class on the SR860 V3
- Cold plates sit on the eight GPUs, the NVLink switches and both processors, and the chassis carries the 1000 W-per-GPU B200 board in 4U.
Choose the SR860 V3 if…
- Processor sockets: 4 against 2 on the XE9680L
- Cores, fully populated: 240 against 128 on the XE9680L
- Memory ceiling: 16 TB against 4 TB on the XE9680L
- Forty-eight front bays in one chassis: all SAS/SATA, or 24 SAS/SATA plus 24 AnyBay with each AnyBay bay on its own Gen5 x4 NVMe link.
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | XE9680L | SR860 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 5 | 10 |
| Most cores per processor | 64 | 60 |
| Processor families | 5th Gen Xeon Scalable | 4th Gen Xeon Scalable |
Memory
| Specification | XE9680L | SR860 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| DIMM slots | 32 | 64 |
| Memory types | RDIMM DDR5-5600 (1DPC) / 4400 MT/s (2DPC) | RDIMM DDR5-4800 · 9x4 RDIMM · 3DS RDIMM |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | XE9680L | SR860 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum bays | 8 | 48 |
| Documented layouts | 1 | 2 |
| Boot devices | BOSS-N1 (2 x M.2 NVMe SSD, hardware RAID 1) | M.2 SATA/NVMe 2-Bay Enablement Kit (4Y37A09738) · M.2 SATA/x4 NVMe 2-Bay Adapter (4Y37A79663) · M.2 NVMe 2-Bay RAID Adapter (4Y37A09750) + 1 more |
| Storage controllers | 1 | 16 |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | XE9680L | SR860 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| OCP slots | 1 | 2 |
| PCIe network slots | 12 | 18 |
| Network cards listed | 8 | 29 |
Power & platform
| Specification | XE9680L | SR860 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power-supply options | 2 | 11 |
| Output range | 2,800–3,000 W | 1,100–2,700 W |
| Input types | AC | AC · 277 VAC / HVDC · −48 V DC |
| Management | iDRAC9 | XClarity Controller 2 |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | 174.3 mm H x 482 mm W (upper 2U 447 mm / lower 2U 434 mm) x 1037.57 mm D with bezel (1025.62 mm without | 906 mm |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
XE9680L: processors by cores and TDP
SR860 V3: processors by cores and TDP
XE9680L: memory with every slot filled
SR860 V3: memory with every slot filled
XE9680L: drive bays
Front panel
8 × 2.5" NVMe at the front — 8 bays in total.
SR860 V3: drive bays
Front panel
8 × 2.5" SAS/SATA at the front — 8 bays in total.
XE9680L: power supplies
SR860 V3: power supplies
XE9680L vs SR860 V3, answered
Is the XE9680L or the SR860 V3 the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The XE9680L lists 5 processors up to 64 cores at 350 W; the SR860 V3 lists 10 up to 60 cores at 350 W. Fully populated that is 128 cores against 240.
Which holds more memory?
The XE9680L has 32 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 4 TB. The SR860 V3 has 64 and 16 TB.
Which takes more drives?
XE9680L: 8 bays across 1 documented layouts. SR860 V3: 48 across 2. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
XE9680L: up to 8 accelerators, 0 double-wide cards listed. SR860 V3: up to 8, 0 double-wide listed.
Do they share any processors?
No. The two documents list different processors, so a like-for-like processor build is not possible across these two.
Where these figures come from. XE9680L: Dell PowerEdge XE9680L Technical Guide (Rev. A04, June 2026) (Dell document). SR860 V3: Lenovo ThinkSystem SR860 V3 Server Product Guide (publication date is not printed in the text export) (Lenovo document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Other comparisons in this class
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.