HPE DL380 Gen12 vs Lenovo SR665 V3
A specification-by-specification comparison of the HPE ProLiant Compute DL380 Gen12 and the Lenovo ThinkSystem SR665 V3, built from HPE’s and Lenovo’s own documents. 2 headline measures favour the DL380 Gen12, 3 favour the SR665 V3, and they share no processors.
Bottom line. DL380 Gen12 leads on virtualisation, databases and in-memory work, AI and acceleration. SR665 V3 leads on storage density. Neither vendor publishes benchmarks for these machines, so every call here is made on what their documents state.

The measures that decide it
Each row is a figure both vendors publish. Bars show the split between the two; a badge marks the larger figure, which is not always the better buy — a shallower chassis or a lower power ceiling can matter more.
Which one, and why
Drawn from the measures above and each model’s own data sheet. Neither vendor publishes benchmark results for these servers, so nothing here claims one is “faster”.
Choose the DL380 Gen12 if…
- Memory ceiling: 8 TB against 6 TB on the SR665 V3
- Accelerators: Up to 8 against Up to 7 on the SR665 V3
- Two Xeon 6 core types in one chassis: seven E-core parts of 64 to 144 cores for dense throughput, and 27 P-core parts of 8 to 86 cores for per-core speed.
Choose the SR665 V3 if…
- Cores, fully populated: 320 against 288 on the DL380 Gen12
- Drive bays: 40 against 36 on the DL380 Gen12
- Largest power supply: 2,600 W against 2,200 W on the DL380 Gen12
- Lenovo lists 48 processors across two EPYC generations in one chassis, spanning 8 cores (EPYC 9015) to 160 (EPYC 9845) at up to 400 W.
Where each one pulls ahead
Calls made on documented capacity only — cores, memory, bays, accelerators and network options — with the figures behind each one shown.
Side by side, differences first
Everything both documents state, grouped. The default view hides rows where the two machines are identical.
Processors
Every processor each vendor lists for the model, from its own document.
| Specification | DL380 Gen12 | SR665 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Processors listed | 34 | 48 |
| Most cores per processor | 144 | 160 |
| Highest processor TDP | 350 W | 400 W |
| Processor families | Xeon 6 E-core · Xeon 6 P-core | AMD EPYC 9005 · AMD EPYC 9004 |
Memory
| Specification | DL380 Gen12 | SR665 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| DIMM slots | 32 | 24 |
| Slots per processor | 16 | 12 |
| Memory types | RDIMM DDR5-6400 | RDIMM DDR5-6400 (5th Gen EPYC) · RDIMM DDR5-4800 (4th Gen EPYC) · 9x4 RDIMM · 3DS RDIMM DDR5-6400 |
Storage
Bay counts are the maximum each document states, including rear and mid-chassis positions.
| Specification | DL380 Gen12 | SR665 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum bays | 36 | 40 |
| Documented layouts | 13 | 19 |
| Bay sizes | 2.5-inch · E3.S · 3.5-inch | 3.5-inch · 2.5-inch |
| Boot devices | HPE NS204i-u v2 480GB NVMe Hot Plug Boot Optimized Storage Device · HPE NS204i-u v2 960GB NVMe Hot Plug Boot Optimized Storage Device · HPE NS204i-u v2 960GB NVMe SED Hot Plug Boot Optimized Storage Device + 3 more | M.2 SATA/x4 NVMe 2-Bay Adapter (4Y37A79663) · M.2 NVMe 2-Bay RAID Adapter (4Y37A09750) · M.2 RAID B540i-2i SATA/NVMe Adapter (4Y37A90063) + 4 more |
| Storage controllers | 14 | 20 |
Accelerators & I/O
| Specification | DL380 Gen12 | SR665 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Accelerators supported | Up to 8 | Up to 7 |
| Double-wide cards listed | 4 | 6 |
| OCP slots | 2 | 1 |
| PCIe network slots | 8 | 12 |
| Network cards listed | 39 | 32 |
Power & platform
| Specification | DL380 Gen12 | SR665 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power-supply options | 5 | 10 |
| Output range | 800–2,200 W | 750–2,600 W |
| Management | HPE iLO 7 | XClarity Controller 2 |
| Chassis depthVendors measure depth differently — see each data sheet | SFF/EDSFF CTO: 72.70 cm (28.62 in) | 766 mm |
Processors, memory, bays and power
The same charts each data sheet carries, drawn to the same scale so the two ranges can be read against each other.
DL380 Gen12: processors by cores and TDP
SR665 V3: processors by cores and TDP
DL380 Gen12: memory with every slot filled
SR665 V3: memory with every slot filled
DL380 Gen12: drive bays
Front panel
12 × EDSFF NVMe at the front — 12 bays in total.
SR665 V3: drive bays
Front panel
24 × 2.5" SAS/SATA at the front — 24 bays in total.
DL380 Gen12: power supplies
SR665 V3: power supplies
DL380 Gen12 vs SR665 V3, answered
Is the DL380 Gen12 or the SR665 V3 the faster server?
Neither document publishes benchmark results, so this page compares what they do state. The DL380 Gen12 lists 34 processors up to 144 cores at 350 W; the SR665 V3 lists 48 up to 160 cores at 400 W. Fully populated that is 288 cores against 320.
Which holds more memory?
The DL380 Gen12 has 32 DIMM slots and a stated ceiling of 8.0 TB. The SR665 V3 has 24 and 6 TB.
Which takes more drives?
DL380 Gen12: 36 bays across 13 documented layouts. SR665 V3: 40 across 19. Counts include rear and mid-chassis positions where the vendor documents them.
Can either take GPUs?
DL380 Gen12: up to 8 accelerators, 4 double-wide cards listed. SR665 V3: up to 7, 6 double-wide listed.
Do they share any processors?
No. The two documents list different processors, so a like-for-like processor build is not possible across these two.
Where these figures come from. DL380 Gen12: HPE ProLiant DL380 Gen12 QuickSpecs (Version 19 - 08-Sep-2026) (HPE document). SR665 V3: Lenovo ThinkSystem SR665 V3 Server Product Guide (publication date is not printed in the text export; guide contains 'New as of July 2026' notes) (Lenovo document). Each claim on this page is derived from those documents, checked page by page on the two data sheets, and carries no pricing.
Other comparisons in this class
Talk to a UK specialist
Get expert advice or a no-obligation quote — servers, storage, networking, maintenance, finance and cloud. We reply the same working day.
